Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350157›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2024

Measurement of maize stalk shear moduli.

Joseph Carter, Joshua Hoffman, Braxton Fjeldsted, Grant Ogilvie, Douglas D Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph CarterBrigham Young University, Provo, USA.
Joshua HoffmanBrigham Young University, Provo, USA.
Braxton FjeldstedBrigham Young University, Provo, USA.
Grant OgilvieBrigham Young University, Provo, USA.
Douglas D CookBrigham Young University, Provo, USA. ddc971@byu.edu.

Funding

National Science Foundation 2046669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maize is the most grown feed crop in the United States. Due to wind storms and other factors, 5% of maize falls over annually. The longitudinal shear modulus of maize stalk tissues is currently unreported and may have a significant influence on stalk failure. To better understand the causes of this phenomenon, maize stalk material properties need to be measured so that they can be used as material constants in computational models that provide detailed analysis of maize stalk failure. This study reports longitudinal shear modulus of maize stalk tissue through repeated torsion testing of dry and fully mature maize stalks. Measurements were focused on the two tissues found in maize stalks: the hard outer rind and the soft inner pith. Uncertainty analysis and comparison of multiple methodologies indicated that all measurements are subject to low error and bias. The results of this study will allow researchers to better understand maize stalk failure modes through computational modeling. This will allow researchers to prevent annual maize loss through later studies. This study also provides a methodology that could be used or adapted in the measurement of tissues from other plants such as sorghum, sugarcane, etc.

Indexed as

BiomechanicsModelingModulusShearTorsion

Identifiers

PMID39350157
PMCPMC11441149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.