Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350156›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Learning curves of novice residents on cataract surgery simulator: the E3CAPS pedagogic study.

Jean-Baptiste Ducloyer, Alexandra Poinas, Léa Duchesne, Pascal Caillet, Corinne Lejus-Bourdeau, Guylène Le Meur, Michel Weber, Catherine Ivan, Nadège Limousin, Thomas Desmidt and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05722080 (E3CAPS), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05722080 naunknown statusnot on this map

E3CAPS: Improvement of the Safety of Care in Cataract Surgery Teaching on Eyesi Simulator: Learning Curve and Impact of Sleep Deprivation on Residents in Ophthalmology

TypeinterventionalSponsorNantes University HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsSurgery-Complications, CataractArmsEyesi simulator, Sleep deprivation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Jean-Baptiste DucloyerCHU Nantes, Ophthalmology Department, Nantes University, Nantes, France. Jean-Baptiste.Ducloyer@univ-nantes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1306-1908
Alexandra PoinasCHU Nantes, Inserm, CIC 1413, Nantes University, Nantes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4183-483X
Léa DuchesneCHU Nantes, Public Health Department, Nantes University, Nantes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8139-319X
Pascal CailletCHU Nantes, Public Health Department, Nantes University, Nantes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5667-7887
Corinne Lejus-BourdeauCHU Nantes, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Nantes University, Nantes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7783-1281
Guylène Le MeurCHU Nantes, Ophthalmology Department, Nantes University, Nantes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9869-1940
Michel WeberCHU Nantes, Ophthalmology Department, Nantes University, Nantes, France.
Catherine IvanCHU Nantes, Ophthalmology Department, Nantes University, Nantes, France.
Nadège LimousinDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital Bretonneau, Tours, France.
Thomas DesmidtUMR 1253, IBraiN, Université de Tours, Inserm, Tours, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0949-8389
Patrick PladysCHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI-UMR 1099, University Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4305-3765
Pierre-Jean PisellaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Tours, Bretonneau Hospital, Tours, 37000, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9729-5444
Anne BernardDepartment of Cardiology, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3580-1548
Hubert LardyDivision of Pediatric Surgery, CHU-Centre de Pédiatrie de Clocheville, Tours, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6717-6129
Philippe GohierDepartment of Ophthalmology, CHU de Angers, Angers, 49100, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0477-3046
Ludovic MartinAll'Sims Centre for Healthcare Simulation, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4325-6765
Frédéric MouriauxDepartment of Ophthalmology, CHU Rennes, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France.
Pierre LebranchuCHU Nantes, Ophthalmology Department, Nantes University, Nantes, France.
Raoul Kanav KhannaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bretonneau University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6032-1488
E3CAPS group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraining novice ophthalmology residents on the EyeSi

methodsThis prospective multicentric pedagogic study was conducted with French novice residents. Each resident completed the recommended four two-hour training sessions and performed a standardized assessment simulating standard cataract surgery before the first session (A0), at the end of the first (A1), second (A2), third (A3) and fourth (A4) sessions. For each surgical step of each attempt, the following data were collected: score, odometer, completion time, posterior capsular rupture and cumulative energy delivered (ultrasounds) during phacoemulsification. A performance threshold was set at a score of 80/100 for each surgical step, 400/500 for the overall procedure. Only descriptive statistics were employed.

resultsSixteen newly nominated ophthalmology residents were included. Median score progressively increased from 95 [IQR 53; 147]) at A0 to 425 [IQR 411; 451] at A4. Despite a significant progression, the "emulsification" step had the lowest A4 scores 86 [IQR 60; 94] without reduction in completion time, odometer or ultrasounds delivered. The rate of posterior capsular rupture decreased linearly from 75% at A0 to 13% at A4 during "emulsification" and from 69 to 0% during "irrigation and aspiration". At A4, only 25% [8; 53] of residents had > 80 at each step and only 75% [47; 92] had > 400/500 overall.

conclusionA training program consisting of four two-hour sessions on the EyeSi simulator over four consecutive days effectively enhances the surgical skills of novice ophthalmology residents. Undergoing more training sessions may improve scores and decrease the incidence of surgical complications, particularly at the emulsification step of cataract surgery. The learning curves presented here can reassure residents who are progressing normally and help identify those who need a further personalized training program. 

trial registrationClinicalTrials registration number: NCT05722080 (first submitted 22/12/2022, first posted 10/02/2023).

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyLearning CurveOphthalmologySimulation TrainingAdultCataract ExtractionEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleFranceHumansMalePhacoemulsificationProspective StudiesCataract surgeryLearning curveOphthalmologyResidentResident ophthalmologist's learningSimulation

Identifiers

PMID39350156
PMCPMC11443795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.