Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350120›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2024

Peer-led intervention for individuals with major depression: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (SUPEERMood).

Xandra Gonzalez-Garcia, M Lucia Moreno-Sancho, Patricia Roa-Díez, Yolanda Caceres-Tejeiro, Sarah-Louise Auvergne Flowers, Concha Gómez de Montes, Miquel Bennasar-Veny, Mauro García-Toro, Aina M Yañez

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06398561 (Peer-led Intervention for Individuals With Major Depression.), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06398561 nacompletednot on this map

Peer-led Intervention for Individuals With Major Depression.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of the Balearic IslandsRan2024 to 2026Enrolled81ConditionsDepressive Disorder, MajorArmsActive Patient Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xandra Gonzalez-GarciaDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of the Balearic Islands (UIB), Palma, Spain.
M Lucia Moreno-SanchoHealth Department of the Balearic Islands, Coordination team of Active Patient Program of the Balearic Islands. Primary Care Management of Mallorca, Palma, Spain.
Patricia Roa-DíezHealth Department of the Balearic Islands, Coordination team of Active Patient Program of the Balearic Islands. Primary Care Management of Mallorca, Palma, Spain.
Yolanda Caceres-TejeiroResearch Group On Global Health, University of the Balearic Islands (UIB), Palma, Spain.
Sarah-Louise Auvergne FlowersDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of the Balearic Islands (UIB), Palma, Spain.
Concha Gómez de MontesPatient Author of Active Patient Program of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain.
Miquel Bennasar-VenyDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of the Balearic Islands (UIB), Palma, Spain. miquel.bennasar@uib.es.
Mauro García-ToroResearch Group On Global Health, University of the Balearic Islands (UIB), Palma, Spain.
Aina M YañezDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of the Balearic Islands (UIB), Palma, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most disabling mental health problems worldwide. The Recovery Model emphasizes peer support to empower individuals with MDD, improve self-management, and patients' quality of life. Despite the demonstrated efficacy of peer-led interventions, further research is needed due to methodological limitations and variability in interventions across studies. Therefore, the objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of an adjuvant peer-led intervention for the reduction of depressive symptoms in individuals diagnosed with MDD attended in primary care mental health units.

methodsA controlled, parallel, randomized clinical trial will be conducted. The intervention group (n = 35) will receive 6 weeks of peer-led sessions based on a peer support program drive whilst supervised by nurses, while the control group (n = 35) will use a mobile Health (mHealth) application for emotional wellness based on CBT for 6 weeks. Measurements will be collected at baseline, at 6 weeks, at 6 and 12 months after the intervention to evaluate post-intervention effects. The primary outcome is the reduction of depressive symptoms through the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) after the intervention. Secondary outcomes will involve measures such as adherence to psychiatric treatment, quality of life, adherence to mediterranean diet, alcohol consumption and physical activity. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that this peer-led intervention, in contrast to the mHealth, will show improvement in BDI-II score reduction of 6 points after six weeks, 6 and 12 months. Standardized peer-led programs can benefit patients and professionals in terms of efficacy and feasibility of clinical treatment of depression, healthy habits, self-care and quality of life. In addition, they can provide recovery and relapse reduction, improved psychosocial support, minimization of intensive care use, and support for patient autonomy through self-management.

trial registrationThe trial protocol is prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under protocol registration number NCT06398561. Date of registration: May 01, 2024. Recruitment is ongoing.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderPeer GroupAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocial SupportTelemedicineDepressionDepressive disordersHealth educationMajor depression disorderMental healthMHealthPeer-leaderPeer supportRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID39350120
PMCPMC11443717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.