Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350098›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2024

Automated scoring methods for quantitative interpretation of Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: a systematic review.

Nurkhairul Bariyah Baharun, Afzan Adam, Mohamed Afiq Hidayat Zailani, Nasir M Rajpoot, Qiaoyi Xu, Reena Rahayu Md Zin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nurkhairul Bariyah BaharunDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The National University of Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, 56000 Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, 56000, Malaysia. p110546@siswa.ukm.edu.my.
Afzan AdamCentre for Artificial Intelligence Technology (CAIT), Faculty of Information Science & Technology, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, 43600, Malaysia.
Mohamed Afiq Hidayat ZailaniDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The National University of Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, 56000 Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, 56000, Malaysia.
Nasir M RajpootDepartment of Computer Science, University of Warwick, 6 Lord Bhattacharyya Way, Coventry, CV4 7EZ, UK.
Qiaoyi XuCentre for Artificial Intelligence Technology (CAIT), Faculty of Information Science & Technology, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, 43600, Malaysia.
Reena Rahayu Md ZinDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The National University of Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, 56000 Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, 56000, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumour microenvironment (TME) of breast cancer mainly comprises malignant, stromal, immune, and tumour infiltrating lymphocyte (TILs). Assessment of TILs is crucial for determining the disease's prognosis. Manual TIL assessments are hampered by multiple limitations, including low precision, poor inter-observer reproducibility, and time consumption. In response to these challenges, automated scoring emerges as a promising approach. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the evidence on the approaches and performance of automated scoring methods for TILs assessment in breast cancer. This review presents a comprehensive compilation of studies related to automated scoring of TILs, sourced from four databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, and PubMed), employing three primary keywords (artificial intelligence, breast cancer, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes). The PICOS framework was employed for study eligibility, and reporting adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. The initial search yielded a total of 1910 articles. Following screening and examination, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria and data were extracted for the review. The findings indicate a concentration of studies on automated TILs assessment in developed countries, specifically the United States and the United Kingdom. From the analysis, a combination of sematic segmentation and object detection (n = 10, 37%) and convolutional neural network (CNN) (n = 11, 41%), become the most frequent automated task and ML approaches applied for model development respectively. All models developed their own ground truth datasets for training and validation, and 59% of the studies assessed the prognostic value of TILs. In conclusion, this analysis contends that automated scoring methods for TILs assessment of breast cancer show significant promise for commodification and application within clinical settings.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingTumor MicroenvironmentFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsAutomated scoringBreast cancerDigital pathologyTumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID39350098
PMCPMC11440723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.