ArticleBMC gastroenterology2024
Diagnosing celiac disease in children using oral manifestations.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCeliac disease (CD) may be frequently undiagnosed due to the absence of characteristic gastroenterologic symptoms in many CD patients. Our objective was to diagnose CD by utilizing documented oral manifestations such as Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis (RAS) and Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH).
methodsThe study comprised sixty children who presented with complaints of RAS lesions. The MIH group consisted of 40 children, while the control group comprised 20 children without MIH lesions, ranging in age from 7 to 13 years. After the dental examination, all children were given a questionnaire to assess whether they had any previous history of general symptoms related to CD. Following that, diagnostic testing for celiac disease were conducted, including serological tests such as Tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-IgA), Endomysium Antibody (EMA), and Total IgA, as well as genetic tests for HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8.
resultsThe statistical analysis, conducted using Fisher's Exact, Yates' Continuity Correction, Fisher Freeman Halton, and Student's t tests, revealed no significant differences between the groups (p < 0.05). Within the MIH group, 3 children exhibited border tTG-IgA values, while another 3 had positive tTG-IgA results. Two of these 6 children had also positive EMA and HLA results. Following a biopsy procedure, these two children were ultimately diagnosed with celiac disease (CD).
conclusionsIn this study, while children initially presented to the clinic with complaints of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS), 2 children (5% of the MIH group) were diagnosed with CD shortly after the onset of MIH lesions. CD enhanced the likelihood of observing some oral manifestations particularly recurrent aphtous stomatitis and developmental enamel defects. We recommend that dentists be cautious about diagnosing CD when RAS lesions and DEDs and/or MIH lesions are present, whether or not other indications of this systemic disease exist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.