Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350043›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer based on hormone receptor status: a retrospective study.

Ran Ran, Shidi Zhao, Yan Zhou, Xinyue Hang, Hui Wang, Yuan Fan, Yusi Zhang, Yifan Qiao, Jin Yang, Danfeng Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ran RanCancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Shidi ZhaoCancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yan ZhouCancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xinyue HangCancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Hui WangCancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yuan FanCancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yusi ZhangCancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yifan QiaoCancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Jin YangCancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China. yangjin@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.
Danfeng DongCancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China. qiwudanfeng@163.com.

Funding

Beijing Science and Technology Innovation Medical Development Foundation KC2021-JF-0167-12CHINA ANTI CANCER ASSOCIATION No. CORP-239Wu Jieping Medical Foundation No. 320.6750.2021-16-31
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent hormone receptor (HR) expression patterns have significant biological and therapeutic implications in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. However, the distinction between HR-positive /HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+) and HR-negative/HER2-positive (HR-/HER2+) subtypes remains unclear.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 828 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from 2012 to 2022. Baseline characteristics were compared by chi-square test. Survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsIn total, 56.3% (n = 466) had HR-positive and 43.7% (n = 362) had HR-negative disease. Comparatively, HR+/HER2 + breast cancers presented favorable clinicopathological features. At a median follow-up of 49 months, 199 disease-free survival (DFS) events and 99 deaths were observed. HR+/HER2 + patients had significantly better survival outcomes than HR-/HER2 + patients. HR-positive status was an independent protective factor for overall survival (OS) [P = 0.032; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.96] and DFS (P = 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46-0.81). HR+/HER2 + patients were significantly less sensitive to neoadjuvant therapy than HR-/HER2 + patients. In the first-line treatment for HR+/HER2 + advanced breast cancer, receiving endocrine therapy significantly improved advanced-OS (P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18-0.59) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.58) compared with not receiving endocrine therapy. Moreover, maintenance endocrine therapy after HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy is associated with significant advanced-OS and PFS benefits compared with no maintenance endocrine therapy (advanced-OS: P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.03-0.12; PFS: P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.57).

conclusionsThis study reveals the high heterogeneity of HER2-positive breast cancer related to HR status in clinicopathological features, metastasis patterns, and outcomes. Large randomized controlled trials are warranted to optimize treatment strategies for the HER2-positive breast cancer population.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneEndocrine therapyHER2-positive breast cancerHER2-targeted therapyHormone receptorSurvival.

Identifiers

PMID39350043
PMCPMC11443648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.