ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2025
A case of chronic spontaneous urticaria with wheals lasting for more than a week.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A case of chronic spontaneous urticaria with wheals lasting for more than a week.The Journal of dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urticaria is characterized by the development of wheals which usually disappear within a day, and are not present beyond a few days. A 58-year-old man began to develop edematous, partially ring-shaped erythematous lesions accompanied by severe body itching without any particular cause, approximately 2 months before his first visit to our hospital. Each rash emerged as being about 5 mm in diameter, gradually enlarging over several days, and disappeared in up to 10 days. Despite oral treatment with several antihistamines and 10 mg of prednisolone, there was no improvement. Most eruptions disappeared without a trace, but the erythema that appeared on the palms left desquamation. The patient had a history of shellfish allergy, but otherwise no atopic diseases. Drug eruption was ruled out due to a lack of regular taking other medications. Histopathological findings of the skin lesions showed moderate lymphocytic and few eosinophilic infiltrates with edema, but no evidence of vasculitis. Despite the concomitant use of two second-generation antihistamines and montelukast, the rash did not improve. The symptoms began to improve following oral intake of 1.5 mg of betamethasone, which was tapered off with the addition of 150 mg of cyclosporin. The use of all medications was stopped at 4 months from the first visit without recurrence. Wheals of chronic spontaneous urticaria may last for longer than a week without apparent histopathological findings of vasculitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.