Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39349941›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

Effectiveness of intra-articular analgesia in reducing postoperative pain after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Sem M M Hermans, Jorm M Nellensteijn, Rob Knoef, Henk van Santbrink, Ruud Droeghaag, Jasper Most, Mattheus K Reinders, Daisy M N Hoofwijk, Jan W Potters, Kris L L Movig and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sem M M HermansDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6130 MB, Heerlen, The Netherlands. semhermans@hotmail.com.
Jorm M NellensteijnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Rob KnoefDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Henk van SantbrinkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ruud DroeghaagDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6130 MB, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Jasper MostDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6130 MB, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Mattheus K ReindersDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Daisy M N HoofwijkDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Jan W PottersDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Kris L L MovigDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Inez CurfsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6130 MB, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Wouter L W van HemertDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6130 MB, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the first postoperative days following minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (MISJF), patients often report serious pain, which contributes to high utilization of painkillers and prevention of early mobilization. This prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial investigates the effectiveness of intraoperative SIJ infiltration with bupivacaine 0.50% versus placebo (NaCl 0.9%) in 42 patients in reducing postoperative pain after MISJF. The primary outcome was difference in pain between bupivacaine and placebo groups, assessed as fixed factor in a linear mixed model. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, adverse events, and length of hospital stay. We found that SIJ infiltration with bupivacaine did not affect postoperative pain scores in comparison with placebo, neither as group-effect (p = 0.68), nor dependent on time (group*time: p = 0.87). None of the secondary outcome parameters were affected in the postoperative period in comparison with placebo, including opioid consumption (p = 0.81). To conclude, intra-articular infiltration of the SIJ with bupivacaine at the end of MISJF surgery is not effective in reducing postoperative pain. Hence, we do not recommend routine use of intraoperative SIJ infiltration with analgesia in MISJF.

Indexed as

BupivacaineMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative PainSacroiliac JointAdultAgedAnalgesiaAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaine

Identifiers

PMID39349941
PMCPMC11442864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.