Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39349934›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Ensemble and optimization algorithm in support vector machines for classification of wheat genotypes.

Mujahid Khan, B K Hooda, Arpit Gaur, Vikram Singh, Yogesh Jindal, Hemender Tanwar, Sushma Sharma, Sonia Sheoran, Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma, Mohammad Khalid and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Use of AI for Phenotype-Genotype Mapping.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mujahid KhanAgricultural Research Station (SKNAU, Jobner), Fatehpur-Shekhawati, Sikar, 332301, India.
B K HoodaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Arpit GaurDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Vikram SinghDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Yogesh JindalDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Hemender TanwarDepartment of Seed Science and Technology, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Sushma SharmaDepartment of Seed Science and Technology, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Sonia SheoranICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India.
Dinesh Kumar VishwakarmaDepartment of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand, 263145, India. dinesh.vishwakarma4820@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2421-6995
Mohammad KhalidDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, 61421, Abha, Asir, Saudi Arabia.
Ghadah Shukri AlbakriDepartment of Teaching and Learning, College of Education and Human Development, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, 11671, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Maha Awjan AlreshidiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Ha'il, 81441, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia.
Jeong Ryeol ChoiSchool of Electronic Engineering, Kyonggi University, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16227, Republic of Korea. choiardor@hanmail.net.
Krishna Kumar YadavDepartment of Environmental Science, Parul Institute of Applied Sciences, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, 391760, India.

Funding

King Khalid University RGP.2/67/45National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1F1A1062849Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University PNURSP2024R584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to classifying wheat genotypes using support vector machines (SVMs) improved with ensemble algorithms and optimization techniques. Utilizing data from 302 wheat genotypes and 14 morphological attributes to evaluate six SVM kernels: linear, radial basis function (RBF), sigmoid, and polynomial degrees 1-3. Various optimization methods, including grid search, random search, genetic algorithms, differential evolution, and particle swarm optimization, were used. The radial basis function kernel achieves the highest accuracy at 93.2%, and the weighted accuracy ensemble further improves it to 94.9%. This study shows the effectiveness of these methods in agricultural research and crop improvement. Notably, optimization-based SVM classification, particularly with particle swarm optimization, saw a significant 1.7% accuracy gain in the test set, reaching 94.9% accuracy. These findings underscore the efficacy of RBF kernels and optimization techniques in improving wheat genotype classification accuracy and highlight the potential of SVMs in agricultural research and crop improvement endeavors.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenotypeSupport Vector MachineTriticumEnsemble algorithmEnsemble weighted average (EWA)Radial basis functionSupport vector machineWheat genotypes classification

Identifiers

PMID39349934
PMCPMC11442772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.