ArticleScientific reports2024
Serial engagement of distinct motor learning mechanisms to alter walking after stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Split-belt treadmill training improves gait symmetry and lower limb function in patients with stroke.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation enhances locomotor adaptation savings in people with multiple sclerosis.Brain communications · 2025Trial
- Sequential gait interventions reveal non-reciprocal transfer between instructional and sensorimotor adaptation mechanisms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill: mechanisms, modulation, and clinical utility.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Error-driven intralimb and interlimb adaptations under asymmetric treadmill and cueing conditions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study asked if combining different motor learning mechanisms-adaptation and reinforcement-could produce immediate improvements in over ground walking after stroke. Fifteen adults with stroke engaged in three conditions: (1) reinforcement following adaptation, (2) reinforcement alone, and (3) adaptation alone. Adaptation involved split-belt treadmill walking to produce after-effects that reduce step asymmetry. Reinforcement involved the use of real-time auditory feedback about step length asymmetry. Auditory feedback was binary, signaling whether steps were asymmetric or equal, but not whether to shorten or lengthen either step. Change in step length asymmetry was the outcome assessed during over ground walking. Reinforcement following adaptation led to reductions in step length asymmetry that persisted into an immediate retention period. Importantly, it led to the desired pattern of lengthening the shorter step in a majority of participants. Reinforcement alone led to no significant change in step length asymmetry, and sometimes produced a non-optimal pattern of shortening the longer step. Our control condition of adaptation alone led to more transient reductions in step length asymmetry. These findings reveal the potential for utilizing serial delivery of adaptation and reinforcement to influence a complex movement in the real-world context of over ground walking, in people with stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.