ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Essential Elements in Synoptic Operative Reports for Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Cancer Surgery: An HPB/CGSO Training Program Survey.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSynoptic operative reports (SORs) are checklists or templates that contain standardized elements of an operation. These elements are associated with standardized inclusion of critical elements of the operative report that translate into numerous potential benefits. Whereas SORs for melanoma, breast, and colorectal cancer surgery have already been widely implemented, similar templates for hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) cancer surgery are currently lacking.
methodsAn anonymous voluntary online survey was distributed to HPB attendings and fellows at HPB and complex general surgical oncology (CGSO) fellowship programs.
resultsThe 54 participants in this study comprised 31 (57%) HPB surgery attendings, 15 (28%) HPB surgery fellows, and 8 (15%) CGSO fellows. Notably, only six (11%) participants reported consistent use of an HPB SOR. The most commonly reported barriers to SOR uptake were the "lack of a readily available template" (55%) and the "lack of consensus/guidelines" (49%). Despite these limiting factors, a majority of respondents indicated a strong willingness to use a standardized and readily available HPB SOR (mean, 4.13/5 ± 1.23). This interest did not differ between attendings and fellows (p = 0.52) or between the participants stratified by surgical experience (p = 0.58). Finally, the participants were provided a comprehensive list of possible elements to incorporate into a standardized pancreatic and hepatobiliary SOR. After the exclusion of elements with less than 75% agreement, the pancreatic SORs included 17 (57%) of 30 possible elements, and the hepatobiliary SORs included 19 (76%) of 25 possible elements.
conclusionBroad consensus on several elements of the HPB SOR suggests that uptake should be accelerated in HPB surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39349910What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.