Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39349880›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2024

A multi-docking strategy for robotic LAR and deep pelvic surgery with the Hugo RAS system: experience from a tertiary referral center.

Matteo Rottoli, Tommaso Violante, Giacomo Calini, Stefano Cardelli, Marco Novelli, Gilberto Poggioli

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07541352 (The Hugo RAS Colorectal Collaborative), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07541352 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Hugo RAS Colorectal Collaborative (HRCC): An International Study to Advance Minimally Invasive Surgery

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaRan2026 to 2029Enrolled2,000ConditionsColorectal Surgery, Robotic Surgery, ColoRectal Cancer and Inflammatory Bowel Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Single-portAnnals of surgical treatment and research · 2025
    Article
  14. Splenic flexure resection with Hugo™ RAS: Trocar placement, docking settings, and surgical strategy.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matteo Rottoli *Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. matteo.rottoli2@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0278-4139
Tommaso Violante *School of General Surgery, Alma Mater Studiorum- University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4439-5254
Giacomo CaliniSurgery of the Alimentary Tract, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. giacomo.calini2@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7460-9578
Stefano CardelliSurgery of the Alimentary Tract, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8870-5176
Marco NovelliDepartment of Statistics, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8827-7797
Gilberto PoggioliSurgery of the Alimentary Tract, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4309-7311

Funding

European Union - NextGeneration EU CUP J33C22002920006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn June 2023, our institution adopted the Medtronic Hugo RAS system for colorectal procedures. This system's independent robotic arms enable personalized docking configurations. This study presents our refined multi-docking strategy for robotic low anterior resection (LAR) and deep pelvic procedures, designed to maximize the Hugo RAS system's potential in rectal surgery, and evaluates the associated learning curve.

methodsThis retrospective analysis included 31 robotic LAR procedures performed with the Hugo RAS system using our novel multi-docking strategy. Docking times were the primary outcome. The Mann-Kendall test, Spearman's correlation, and cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis were used to assess the learning curve and efficiency gains associated with the strategy.

resultsDocking times showed a significant negative trend (p < 0.01), indicating improved efficiency with experience. CUSUM analysis confirmed a distinct learning curve, with proficiency achieved around the 15th procedure. The median docking time was 6 min, comparable to other robotic platforms after proficiency.

conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of a multi-docking strategy in robotic LAR using the Hugo RAS system. Our personalized approach, capitalizing on the system's unique features, resulted in efficient docking times and streamlined surgical workflow. This approach may be particularly beneficial for surgeons transitioning from laparoscopic to robotic surgery, facilitating a smoother adoption of the new technology. Further research is needed to validate the generalizability of these findings across different surgical settings and experience levels.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresTertiary Care CentersAdultAgedFemaleHumansLearning CurveMaleMiddle AgedPelvisRetrospective StudiesLearning curveLow anterior resectionMedtronic Hugo RASMulti-docking strategyRectal cancerRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39349880
PMCPMC11442597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.