ReviewArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Outcomes of acetabular fractures.
Review in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolated screw fixation of posterior wall fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Efficacy Comparison of Open Reduction and Robot-Aided Infra-Acetabular and Posterior Column Screws Fixation in Complex Acetabular Fractures Surgery: Union Plate Versus Reconstruction Plate.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Digital measurement and safety parameter analysis of the infra-acetabular screw pathway.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of the Biomechanical Stability of Two Fix-and-Replace Techniques in an Acetabular Fracture Model with Pelvic Discontinuity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Impaired patient-reported outcomes but preserved gait patterns 5-15 years after acetabular fracture compared with healthy controls.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Acute total hip arthroplasty for posterior wall acetabular fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acetabular fractures are prognostic relevant fractures in terms of function and daily activities. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is still the gold-standard in treating these injuries. Over recent years, several reports are dealing with outcome evaluations but have the main disadvantage of combining several fracture types., Thus, it remains unclear to discuss a fracture-based prognosis. This analysis evaluated fracture-type specific results in terms of clinical and radiological outcome. Analyzing elementary fracture types, pure transverse and isolated posterior column fractures are associated with relevant functional impairments. Except for posterior column fractures all other elementary fracture types were associated with degenerative changes in nearly 20%. Anterior column fractures seems to be "forgiving fractures" as they are associated with the longest median time until hip joint failure occurs. In associated fracture-types T-shaped fractures are still demanding fractures with < 60% anatomic reductions and a high rate of functional impairments. All associated fracture types are associated with a relevant rate of secondary degeneration of the hip joint between 20 and 40% of patients. Early hip joint failure (THR, Femoral head necrosis, severe heterotopic ossification) within the 1st year is frequently seen in associated posterior column and posterior wall fractures, but with a relative good prognosis, if the joint survived the first year after ORIF. The highest survival rates of the hip joint is observed with ABC-fractures. Also, these fractures seem to be "forgiving fractures".
Indexed as
Identifiers
39349875What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.