ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Development of a Standardized Photo Guideline for Online Hair Transplantation Consultation.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTelemedicine has rapidly advanced in plastic and aesthetic surgery, but obtaining high-quality images during online hair transplantation consultations remains challenging, impeding doctors' visual evaluation.
objectiveTo investigate patients' attitude and satisfaction with online hair transplantation consultations, and to develop a standardized photo guideline to help patients capture high-quality images.
methodsWe surveyed patients' attitudes and satisfaction with online hair transplantation consultations from November 23, 2023 to May 3, 2024. Meanwhile, five surgeons developed a standardized photo guideline and assessed its effectiveness by comparing image quality between two patient groups: those using the photo guideline and those not using it.
resultsWe collected 570 responses to the attitude questionnaire, with 76.66% of participants expressing a willingness to undergo online hair transplantation consultations. The patient satisfaction survey yielded an overall satisfaction score of 4.44 ± 0.72 out of 5 for online hair transplantation consultations. Furthermore, all five surgeons rated photographs taken by patients following the photo guideline as higher quality compared to those taken by patients who did not use it.
conclusionPatients show high satisfaction with online hair transplantation consultations. The standardized photo guideline proves effective in helping patients take high-quality photographs for online consultations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39349778What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.