ArticleCommunications medicine2024
MHC class II genotypes are independent predictors of anti-PD1 immunotherapy response in melanoma.
Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Class II Major Histocompatibility Complex Transactivator (CIITA): A Master MHC-II Regulator Impacting Cancer and Beyond.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026Review
- The role of neoantigens and tumor mutational burden in cancer immunotherapy: advances, mechanisms, and perspectives.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Breast cancer scoring based on a multiplexed profiling of soluble and cell-associated (immune) markers facilitates the prediction of pembrolizumab therapy.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint blockade is a highly successful anti-cancer immunotherapy. Both CTLA4 and PD1 checkpoint blockers are clinically available for melanoma treatment, with anti-PD1 therapy reaching response rates of 35-40%. These responses, which are mediated via neoantigen presentation by the polymorphic MHC complex, are hard to predict and the tumor mutation burden is currently one of the few available biomarkers. While MHC genotypes are expected to determine therapy responses, association studies have remained largely elusive.
methodsWe developed an overall MHC genotype binding score (MGBS), indicative of a patient's MHC class I (MHC-I) and class II (MHC-II) neoantigen binding capacity and solely based on the germline MHC-I (MGBS-I) and MHC-II (MGBS-II) genotypes. These scores were then correlated to survival and clinical responses following anti-PD1 immunotherapy in a previously published dataset of 144 melanoma patients.
resultsWe demonstrate that MGBS scores are TMB-independent predictors of anti-PD1 immunotherapy responses in melanoma. Opposite outcomes were found for both MHC classes, with high MGBS-I and MGBS-II predicting good and bad outcomes, respectively. Interestingly, high MGBS-II is mainly associated with treatment response failure in a subgroup of anti-CTLA4 pretreated patients.
conclusionsOur results suggest that MGBS, calculated solely from the MHC genotype, has clinical potential as a non-invasive and tumor-independent biomarker to guide anti-cancer immunotherapy in melanoma.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.