Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39349759›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2024

MHC class II genotypes are independent predictors of anti-PD1 immunotherapy response in melanoma.

Arne Claeys, Jimmy Van den Eynden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arne ClaeysDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Unit of Anatomy and Embryology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6990-1569
Jimmy Van den EyndenDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Unit of Anatomy and Embryology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. jimmy.vandeneynden@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0002-5614

Funding

Large Scale Sequencing and Analysis of GenomesU54HG003067 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GABRIEL, STACEY, LANDER, ERIC S · 2004 to 2015
$568.6M
Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds (Special Research Fund) BOF.STG.2019.0073.01NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG003067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint blockade is a highly successful anti-cancer immunotherapy. Both CTLA4 and PD1 checkpoint blockers are clinically available for melanoma treatment, with anti-PD1 therapy reaching response rates of 35-40%. These responses, which are mediated via neoantigen presentation by the polymorphic MHC complex, are hard to predict and the tumor mutation burden is currently one of the few available biomarkers. While MHC genotypes are expected to determine therapy responses, association studies have remained largely elusive.

methodsWe developed an overall MHC genotype binding score (MGBS), indicative of a patient's MHC class I (MHC-I) and class II (MHC-II) neoantigen binding capacity and solely based on the germline MHC-I (MGBS-I) and MHC-II (MGBS-II) genotypes. These scores were then correlated to survival and clinical responses following anti-PD1 immunotherapy in a previously published dataset of 144 melanoma patients.

resultsWe demonstrate that MGBS scores are TMB-independent predictors of anti-PD1 immunotherapy responses in melanoma. Opposite outcomes were found for both MHC classes, with high MGBS-I and MGBS-II predicting good and bad outcomes, respectively. Interestingly, high MGBS-II is mainly associated with treatment response failure in a subgroup of anti-CTLA4 pretreated patients.

conclusionsOur results suggest that MGBS, calculated solely from the MHC genotype, has clinical potential as a non-invasive and tumor-independent biomarker to guide anti-cancer immunotherapy in melanoma.

Identifiers

PMID39349759
PMCPMC11443121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.