Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39349723›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

FMRI speech tracking in primary and non-primary auditory cortex while listening to noisy scenes.

Lars Hausfeld, Iris M H Hamers, Elia Formisano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Selective Attention Shapes Neural Representations of Complex Auditory Scenes: The Roles of Object Identity and Scene Composition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lars HausfeldDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. lars.hausfeld@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-4396-8201
Iris M H HamersDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0007-0296-3969
Elia FormisanoDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5008-2460

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) 406.20.GO.030Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) 451-17-033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive and non-invasive electrophysiological measurements during "cocktail-party"-like listening indicate that neural activity in the human auditory cortex (AC) "tracks" the envelope of relevant speech. However, due to limited coverage and/or spatial resolution, the distinct contribution of primary and non-primary areas remains unclear. Here, using 7-Tesla fMRI, we measured brain responses of participants attending to one speaker, in the presence and absence of another speaker. Through voxel-wise modeling, we observed envelope tracking in bilateral Heschl's gyrus (HG), right middle superior temporal sulcus (mSTS) and left temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), despite the signal's sluggish nature and slow temporal sampling. Neurovascular activity correlated positively (HG) or negatively (mSTS, TPJ) with the envelope. Further analyses comparing the similarity between spatial response patterns in the single speaker and concurrent speakers conditions and envelope decoding indicated that tracking in HG reflected both relevant and (to a lesser extent) non-relevant speech, while mSTS represented the relevant speech signal. Additionally, in mSTS, the similarity strength correlated with the comprehension of relevant speech. These results indicate that the fMRI signal tracks cortical responses and attention effects related to continuous speech and support the notion that primary and non-primary AC process ongoing speech in a push-pull of acoustic and linguistic information.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleNoiseSpeechYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39349723
PMCPMC11442455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.