Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39349714›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

What factors affect a patient's subjective perception of MRI examination.

Marek Dostál, Kateřina Jurasová, Miloš Keřkovský, Jiří Vaníček, Ladislav Kalas, Luboš Látal, Svatava Janků, Vladimír Trojek, Andrea Šprláková-Puková

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marek DostálDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University Brno, Jihlavská 20, Brno, 625 00, Czech Republic.
Kateřina JurasováDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University Brno, Jihlavská 20, Brno, 625 00, Czech Republic.
Miloš KeřkovskýDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University Brno, Jihlavská 20, Brno, 625 00, Czech Republic. kerkovsky.milos@fnbrno.cz.
Jiří VaníčekDepartment of Imaging Methods, Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno, St. Anna University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ladislav KalasDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Blansko, Blansko, Czech Republic.
Luboš LátalDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Kyjov, Kyjov, Czech Republic.
Svatava JankůDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Břeclav, Břeclav, Czech Republic.
Vladimír TrojekDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Kroměříž, Kroměříž, Czech Republic.
Andrea Šprláková-PukováDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University Brno, Jihlavská 20, Brno, 625 00, Czech Republic.

Funding

Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky FNBr, 65269705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI is becoming increasingly available and more common. However, it is a long examination, within a limited space, and making strong demands on the patient for proper co-operation. Using survey data collected by prospective questionnaire, this work examines the influence of patient preparation and type of MRI device on patients' subjective perception of the examination. The work analysed 800 patient questionnaires from 7 radiology centres, 12 MRI machines from 3 manufacturers. It was shown that 20% of patients were not informed at all or only insufficiently about the MRI examination by the referring physician, and this had a statistically significant effect on subjective perception as to the length of the examination. In claustrophobic patients, there was no significant difference in the perception of MRI examination between machine types (open vs. closed) or between bore size. This work demonstrated the influence of technical parameters of MRI devices on some other evaluated aspects in terms of patients' perception of MRI examinations (such as noise perception or peripheral nerves irritation) and that the preparation prior to the examination itself plays also an important role. Sufficient explanation from the referring physician, good workplace time management, and sufficient communication with the patient influence the subjective perception of the examination and thus indirectly its diagnostic benefit.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultHealthcare Quality AssessmentMagnetic resonance imagingTime management

Identifiers

PMID39349714
PMCPMC11442905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.