ReviewLeukemia2024
Managing the unmanageable: evidence-driven approaches to real-world patient prototypes of TP53-mutant myelodysplastic neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemia.
Review in Leukemia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR-based functional genomics for dissecting therapeutic dependency in primary acute myeloid leukemia samples.Molecular cell · 2026Article
- Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- The evolving nosology of myeloid neoplasms: the semi-centennial of the 1976 French-American-British classification.Leukemia · 2025Review
- Newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in unfit patients: 2026 treatment algorithms.Blood cancer journal · 2025Review
- Bone metastases of prostate cancer: Molecular mechanisms, targeted diagnosis and targeted therapy (Review).Oncology reports · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a disulfidptosis-related genes signature for predicting outcomes and immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Editorial: Immunobiology and immunotherapeutics in myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with TP53 aberrations comprise the highest risk subset of all myeloid malignancies. The managerial conundrum of TP53-mutant myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) stems from refractoriness to or relapse after conventional chemotherapy, as well as the limited translational success of investigational therapies targeting TP53-mutant cells. Thus far, no targeted therapies have been commercially approved for this mutational subset. As a result, management plans for patients with TP53-mutant MDS and AML are often driven by clinical judgment and/or physician preference rather than consensus guidelines backed by a rigorous evidence basis. This clinical case-based, evidence-driven review highlights the most salient data that guides the management of commonly encountered patient prototypes. This review discusses the therapeutic menu of first-line options that derive from multi-institutional experiences as well as from disease-centric consortia and discusses how these first-line options can be optimally tailored to heterogeneous groups of patients. The debate regarding whether allogeneic stem cell transplant should be offered to these patients is summarized. Finally, this review explores the recent unfortunate news of pauses in clinical trials for the leading investigational agents - eprenetapopt, magrolimab, sabatolimab, and idasanutlin - and offers solutions toward re-invigorating the pipeline of precision therapeutics in 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39349613What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.