ArticleScientific reports2024
Proof of concept study on early forecasting of antimicrobial resistance in hospitalized patients using machine learning and simple bacterial ecology data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From surveillance to intelligence: a scoping review of machine learning for antimicrobial resistance surveillance intelligence across One Health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens is a major threat to global health, exacerbated by the misuse of antibiotics. In hospital practice, results of bacterial cultures and antibiograms can take several days. Meanwhile, prescribing an empirical antimicrobial treatment is challenging, as clinicians must balance the antibiotic spectrum against the expected probability of susceptibility. We present here a proof of concept study of a machine learning-based system that predicts the probability of antimicrobial susceptibility and explains the contribution of the different cofactors in hospitalized patients, at four different stages prior to the antibiogram (sampling, direct examination, positive culture, and species identification), using only historical bacterial ecology data that can be easily collected from any laboratory information system (LIS) without GDPR restrictions once the data have been anonymised. A comparative analysis of different state-of-the-art machine learning and probabilistic methods was performed using 44,026 instances over 7 years from the Hôpital Européen Marseille, France. Our results show that multilayer dense neural networks and Bayesian models are suitable for early prediction of antibiotic susceptibility, with AUROCs reaching 0.88 at the positive culture stage and 0.92 at the species identification stage, and even 0.82 and 0.92, respectively, for the least frequent situations. Perspectives and potential clinical applications of the system are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.