Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39349512›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Efficacy of automated machine learning models and feature engineering for diagnosis of equivocal appendicitis using clinical and computed tomography findings.

Juho An, Il Seok Kim, Kwang-Ju Kim, Ji Hyun Park, Hyuncheol Kang, Hyuk Jung Kim, Young Sik Kim, Jung Hwan Ahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juho An *Department of Emergency Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, World Cup-ro, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499, South Korea.
Il Seok Kim *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seongan-ro, Seoul, 05355, South Korea.
Kwang-Ju KimElectronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), Techno sunhwan-ro, Daegu, 42994, South Korea.
Ji Hyun ParkOffice of Biostatistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Ajou Research Institute for Innovative Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, World Cup-ro, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499, South Korea.
Hyuncheol KangDepartment of Big Data and AI, Hoseo University, Hoseo-ro, Asan, Chungcheongnam-do, 31499, South Korea.
Hyuk Jung KimDepartment of Radiology, Daejin Medical Center, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, Seohyeon-ro, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, 13590, South Korea.
Young Sik KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Daejin Medical Center, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, Seohyeon-ro, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, 13590, South Korea.
Jung Hwan AhnDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, World Cup-ro, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499, South Korea. erdrajh@naver.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the diagnostic efficacy of automated machine learning (AutoGluon) with automated feature engineering and selection (autofeat), focusing on clinical manifestations, and a model integrating both clinical manifestations and CT findings in adult patients with ambiguous computed tomography (CT) results for acute appendicitis (AA). This evaluation was compared with conventional single machine learning models such as logistic regression(LR) and established scoring systems such as the Adult Appendicitis Score(AAS) to address the gap in diagnostic approaches for uncertain AA cases. In this retrospective analysis of 303 adult patients with indeterminate CT findings, the cohort was divided into appendicitis (n = 115) and non-appendicitis (n = 188) groups. AutoGluon and autofeat were used for AA prediction. The AutoGluon-clinical model relied solely on clinical data, whereas the AutoGluon-clinical-CT model included both clinical and CT data. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and other metrics for the test dataset, namely accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and F1 score, were used to compare AutoGluon models with single machine learning models and the AAS. The single ML models in this study were LR, LASSO regression, ridge regression, support vector machine, decision tree, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting. Feature importance values were extracted using the "feature_importance" attribute from AutoGluon. The AutoGluon-clinical model demonstrated an AUROC of 0.785 (95% CI 0.691-0.890), and the ridge regression model with only clinical data revealed an AUROC of 0.755 (95% CI 0.649-0.861). The AutoGluon-clinical-CT model (AUROC 0.886 with 95% CI 0.820-0.951) performed better than the ridge model using clinical and CT data (AUROC 0.852 with 95% CI 0.774-0.930, p = 0.029). A new feature, exp(-(duration from pain to CT)

Indexed as

AppendicitisMachine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveAcute appendicitisAutomated feature engineeringAutomated machine learningComputed tomographyEquivocal

Identifiers

PMID39349512
PMCPMC11442641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.