ArticleScientific reports2024
Machine learning optimized DriverDetect software for high precision prediction of deleterious mutations in human cancers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Progress and trends on machine learning in proteomics during 1997-2024: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The detection of cancer-driving mutations is important for understanding cancer pathology and therapeutics development. Prediction tools have been created to streamline the computation process. However, most tools available have heterogeneous sensitivity or specificity. We built a machine learning-derived algorithm, DriverDetect that combines the outputs of seven pre-existing tools to improve the prediction of candidate driver cancer mutations. The algorithm was trained with cancer gene-specific mutation datasets of cancer patients to identify cancer drivers. DriverDetect performed better than the individual tools or their combinations in the validation test. It has the potential to incorporate future novel prediction algorithms and can be retrained with new datasets, offering an expanded application to pan-cancer analysis for cross-cancer study. (115 words).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.