Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39349504›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

The dimensional structure of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale in first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders: an Exploratory Graph Analysis from the OPTiMiSE trial.

Francesco Dal Santo, María Paz García-Portilla, Emilio Fernández-Egea, Leticia González-Blanco, Pilar A Sáiz, Giulia Maria Giordano, Silvana Galderisi, Julio Bobes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francesco Dal SantoÁrea de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9879-6443
María Paz García-PortillaÁrea de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. albert@uniovi.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3643-1622
Emilio Fernández-EgeaCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Fulbourn Hospital, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4128-8955
Leticia González-BlancoÁrea de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6238-4773
Pilar A SáizÁrea de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5705-4523
Giulia Maria GiordanoDepartment of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Silvana GalderisiDepartment of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1592-7656
Julio BobesÁrea de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2187-4033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is the most widely used rating scale to assess psychotic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia and other primary psychoses. However, a definitive consensus regarding its dimensional structure remains elusive. The present work aims to determine the number of dimensions of the scale through a network analysis approach in a sample of individuals experiencing first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder (FE-SSD) with minimal or no prior exposure to antipsychotic treatment. Baseline data of 446 participants (age 25.96 ± 5.99 years, 70% males) enrolled in the OPTiMiSE trial were analysed. Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) was conducted to evaluate the dimensionality of the PANSS, and a bootstrap approach (bootEGA) was employed to assess model stability. The analysis was replicated, excluding unstable items with stability values below 0.75, until a stable model was achieved. The analysis of the 30 items of the PANSS revealed inadequate structural consistency, resulting in the exclusion of 9 unstable items. The final model comprised 21 symptoms distributed across four communities (Positive, Cognitive/Disorganised, Excited/Aggressive and Negative) but lacked a depressive domain. In conclusion, we propose a concise version of the PANSS, incorporating 21 items, to better assess the core symptoms of the first episode of SSD. This revised version provides clinicians with a robust psychometric tool with reduced administration time, but the complementary administration of a dedicated instrument for evaluating affective symptoms is advisable.

Identifiers

PMID39349504
PMCPMC11442741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.