Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39349493›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2024

Computerized cognitive training improves cognitive function in primary breast cancer survivors.

Karl R Kleinknecht, Mira Bierend, Lisa-Maria Keim, Frederik Bartels, Amit Lampit, Carsten Finke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cognitive training for breast cancer patients with cancer-related cognitive impairment: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Mapping Cognitive Oncology: A Decade of Trends and Research Fronts.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karl R Kleinknecht *Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4553-0593
Mira Bierend *Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. m.bierend@drk-kliniken-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3154-2378
Lisa-Maria KeimDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Frederik BartelsDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Amit LampitDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Carsten FinkeDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7665-1171

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) FI 2309/1-1; FI 2309/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer-related cognitive impairment has a significant impact on the quality of life and perceived cognitive ability of breast cancer patients and frequently affects attention, working memory, and executive function. Several interventional approaches to treat these deficits have been studied, including web-based cognitive training, but methods and timing in relation to cancer treatment are heterogeneous. Only few interventions start early after primary breast cancer treatment, a time when many patients report the greatest impairments in quality of life and cognition. In this randomized controlled pilot study, 31 breast cancer survivors with subjective cognitive deficits and a mean post-treatment duration of 6.6 months (SD = 9.3) were assigned to either 14 weeks of a web-based cognitive training program (training group, n = 16) or a control group (n = 15). All patients underwent detailed neuropsychological assessment, evaluation of patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), and neurological examination before (baseline, T1) and after (follow-up, T2) the intervention. Longitudinal (T1 vs. T2) and cross-sectional (T2) cognitive performance was assessed for both groups. Overall cognitive impairment significantly improved in the training group following training (56% vs 25%; p = 0.03, Phi = 0.51), but not in the control group (73% vs. 73%; p = 1) in the longitudinal analysis (T1 vs. T2). Specifically, the training group showed statistically significant improvement of executive functions (p = 0.004, Phi = 0.32). No effects of training on subjective cognitive deficits or PROMs were observed. Comparing cross-sectional cognitive performance at follow-up (T2), the training group showed a significantly lower rate of cognitive impairment overall (p = 0.007, Phi = 0.48) and a better cognitive performance for executive function (p = 0.04, Phi = 0.32) compared to the control group. In this prospective pilot study, web-based cognitive training was efficacious in improving overall cognitive performance and executive function. Importantly, this study investigated a web-based cognitive training for the immediate post-treatment phase, when up to 75% of breast cancer patients experience cognitive decline. These results indicate that cognitive training may improve neuropsychological outcomes for patients with breast cancer.

Identifiers

PMID39349493
PMCPMC11443049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.