Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39349380›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2024

Dynamic Interplay of Online Risk and Resilience in Adolescence (DIORA): a protocol for a 12-month prospective observational study testing the associations among digital activity, affective and cognitive reactions and depression symptoms in a community sample of UK adolescents.

Katarzyna Kostyrka-Allchorne, Mariya Stoilova, Jake Bourgaize, Aja Murray, Eliz Azeri, Chris Hollis, Ellen Townsend, Sonia Livingstone, Edmund Sonuga-Barke, Digital Youth Research Team

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katarzyna Kostyrka-AllchorneDepartment of Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0789-2449
Mariya StoilovaDepartment of Media and Communications, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-7146
Jake BourgaizeDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
Aja MurrayDepartment of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9068-3188
Eliz AzeriDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, London, UK.
Chris HollisNIHR MindTech MedTech Cooperative and NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ellen TownsendSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4677-5958
Sonia LivingstoneThe London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3248-9862
Edmund Sonuga-BarkeDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK edmund.sonuga-barke@kcl.ac.uk.
Digital Youth Research Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe impact of digital activity on adolescent mental health has been difficult to assess because of methodological limitations and a lack of strong theory. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective observational study with three assessment points: baseline (T1), 6 months (T2) and 12 months (T3). We aim to recruit a minimum of 276 adolescents aged between 13 and 14 years from secondary schools in the UK and 1 parent/caregiver/guardian (hereafter, 'parent') for each adolescent. Study questionnaires will be completed online.We will fit a range of models to examine the direct and indirect associations among digital activity, the reactions it evokes, depression and wellbeing, and individual and contextual mediators and moderators drawing on the structural equation modelling framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the London School of Economics and Political Science Research Ethics Committee, reference number 249287. The results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and disseminated through presentations, posters and blogs.

Indexed as

DepressionResilience, PsychologicalAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorCognitionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesResearch DesignSelf EfficacyUnited Kingdomadolescentbehaviordepression & mood disordersdigital technologymental health

Identifiers

PMID39349380
PMCPMC11448176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.