ArticleBMJ open quality2024
Improving role allocation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the emergency department: a quality improvement project.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of Paediatric Life Support Recommendations: A Survey in the D-A-CH Region.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Moving beyond chest compression fraction: the need to measure high-quality chest compression fraction during cardiac arrest.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Evaluating a Shared Decision Support Tool for Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Arrest: Mixed Methods Usability Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Unravelling technical domain barriers and non-technical skill barriers among interprofessional teams during in-hospital cardiac arrest: a questionnaire-based survey.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Resuscitation outcomes and associated factors among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients at the National Referral Hospital, Bhutan: a prospective cohort study.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators for interaction in cardiopulmonary resuscitation teams: a qualitative study.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn any healthcare setting, cardiopulmonary resuscitations (CPRs) stand out as demanding and chaotic resuscitation endeavours. Emergency departments (EDs) witness a significant volume of CPRs. Given the critical nature of CPR, content knowledge and procedural skills alone fall short in delivering optimal care. Effective teamwork, complemented by a well-coordinated response, is imperative for achieving favourable patient outcomes. A survey conducted in our ED highlighted that while the majority of staff acknowledged the significance of teamwork in CPR and were aware of the whiteboard for assigning team roles, only 19% were familiar with their individual roles during CPR.
methodsTo address this gap, our project aimed to increasing the role delegation for CPR from 19% to 80% within 2 months. We formed an interprofessional team and implemented strategies through four plan-do-study-act cycles. Interventions encompassed increasing sensitisation, creating a simplified format for assigning team roles and entrusting the nursing team leader of each shift with the responsibility of role assignment for accountability. The sharing of progress charts for acknowledgment served as a motivating factor, leading to sustained adherence to the project goals without necessitating reminders in the final two weeks.
resultsThis project proved to be highly successful as our process indicator steadily increased and remained above the target for 4 consecutive weeks.
conclusionOur results underscore the importance of patience and teamwork in achieving project objectives. It serves as a good example of the efficiency of simple and cost-effective interventions, one that can be replicated and implemented in other EDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.