ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2025
Opposite-Direction Spatial Working Memory Biases in People With Schizophrenia and Healthy Control Participants.
Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibody-Mediated Mechanisms in Autoimmune Neurological Disorders.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Review
- Prior Trial Effects on Working Memory in Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Healthy Control Individuals.JAMA psychiatry · 2026Article
- Clashing memories in working memory modulate serial dependence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Intact Serial Dependence in Schizophrenia: Evidence from an Orientation Adjustment Task.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Article
- Serial dependence: A matter of memory load.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople with schizophrenia (PSZ) show impaired accuracy in spatial working memory (sWM), which is thought to reflect abnormalities in the sustained firing of feature selective neurons that are critical for successful encoding and maintenance processes. Recent research has documented a new source of variance in the accuracy of sWM: In healthy adults, sWM representations are unconsciously biased by previous trials such that current-trial responses are attracted to previous-trial responses (serial dependence). This opens a new window to examine how schizophrenia impacts both the sustained neural firing representing the current-trial target and the longer-term synaptic plasticity that stores previous-trial information.
methodsWe examined response accuracy in a single-item sWM test with delay intervals of 0, 2, 4, or 8 seconds in 41 PSZ and 32 demographically similar healthy control participants. Our main dependent variable was the bias index, which quantifies the extent to which the current-trial responses were biased toward or away from the previous-trial target.
resultsPSZ showed opposite-direction serial dependence bias effects: Healthy control participants showed an attractive bias that increased over increasing delays whereas PSZ showed a repulsion bias that increased over delays. In PSZ, the magnitude of the repulsion bias negatively correlated with broad measures of cognitive ability and WM capacity.
conclusionsPSZ show opposite-direction effects of previous trials on WM. Such qualitatively distinct differences in performance are extremely rare in psychopathology and may index a fundamental alteration in neural processing that could serve as a valuable biomarker for pathophysiology and treatment development research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.