Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39348722›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2024

Prone transpsoas lateral interbody fusion with retractor-mounted camera and heads-up display: illustrative case.

Suraj Sulhan, Jonathan N Sellin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suraj SulhanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Hospital Neurological Institute, Houston, Texas.
Jonathan N SellinNeurosurgical Group of Texas, Houston, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prone transpsoas (PTP) technique involves the performance of a lateral lumbar interbody fusion with the patient prone. One challenge encountered in the early experience with the PTP technique is that with the patient in the prone position rather than the lateral decubitus position, the surgeon is often forced to raise the bed significantly and perform the interbody work in a hunched and seated position with their neck extended and shoulders abducted. The authors report on the use of a sterile retractor-mounted camera during PTP that allows for the surgery to be performed with surgical anatomy visualized on a heads-up display. OBSERVATIONS: The PTP procedure is performed without significant modification from standard practice. After the self-retaining retractor is inserted, a sterile retractor-mounted camera can be introduced down one of the blades of the self-retaining retractor, preferably the dorsally situated blade to avoid camera line-of-sight issues with dependent irrigation or bleeding. The surgical field can now be visualized on a high-definition monitor, allowing the surgeon to stand at the patient's side instead of sitting. LESSONS: A sterile retractor-mounted camera with a heads-up display is a novel way to address ergonomic challenges as well as improve educational opportunities in the operating room. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24318.

Indexed as

case reportheads-up displaylateral lumbar interbody fusionprone transpsoasprone transpsoas lateral interbody fusion

Identifiers

PMID39348722
PMCPMC11445863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.