Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39348680›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

Psychoeducational Burnout Intervention for Nurses: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Ili Abdullah Sharin, Norehan Jinah, Pangie Bakit, Izzuan Khirman Adnan, Nor Haniza Zakaria, Shazwani Mohmad, Siti Zubaidah Ahmad Subki, Nursyahda Zakaria, Kun Yun Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ili Abdullah Sharin *Centre of Leadership & Professional Development (CLPD), Institute for Health Management (IHM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0006-3244-1929
Norehan Jinah *Centre of Leadership & Professional Development (CLPD), Institute for Health Management (IHM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0007-1546-9791
Pangie Bakit *Centre of Leadership & Professional Development (CLPD), Institute for Health Management (IHM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-9207-8929
Izzuan Khirman Adnan *Centre of Leadership & Professional Development (CLPD), Institute for Health Management (IHM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0002-0815-7590
Nor Haniza Zakaria *Centre of Leadership & Professional Development (CLPD), Institute for Health Management (IHM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-7970-1085
Shazwani Mohmad *Centre of Leadership & Professional Development (CLPD), Institute for Health Management (IHM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0811-9498
Siti Zubaidah Ahmad Subki *Centre of Leadership & Professional Development (CLPD), Institute for Health Management (IHM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0009-3889-4066
Nursyahda Zakaria *Centre of Leadership & Professional Development (CLPD), Institute for Health Management (IHM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9636-6490
Kun Yun Lee *Centre of Leadership & Professional Development (CLPD), Institute for Health Management (IHM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8606-3541

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurses face high levels of stress and emotional exhaustion due to heavy workloads and demanding work environments. Prolonged exposure to these stressors predisposes nurses to burnout, which can adversely affect patient care. Addressing burnout among nurses requires a multifaceted approach, involving both personal and organizational strategies. While organizational strategies target systemic workplace issues, personal interventions are often favored for their ease of implementation, immediate benefits, and empowerment of health care workers through stress management and resilience-building. Prioritizing evidence-based interventions to mitigate burnout among nurses is crucial for managing occupational stress and promoting well-being. Person-directed psychoeducation is an effective personal intervention strategy used to equip nurses with the appropriate knowledge and skills to handle stressors, thereby safeguarding their mental health and ensuring high-quality patient care.

objectiveThis protocol proposes a systematic review that aims to identify and assess the effectiveness of person-directed psychoeducational interventions for nurses. The review aims to pinpoint effective interventions that can be implemented to manage burnout and support the mental health of nurses.

methodsThis systematic review will follow the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. In total of 5 electronic databases (PubMed-MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and ScienceDirect) will be searched for studies published between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2023. The search will encompass 3 main keywords: "nurses," "burnout intervention," and "burnout." Predefined eligibility criteria will guide the screening process. Data will be extracted to address the objectives of the review. The risk of bias for each study will be assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools.

resultsPreliminary searches have been initiated since February 2024, with the review expected to be completed by June 2024. The expected results will include a comprehensive list of psychoeducational interventions and their effectiveness in reducing burnout among nurses. The review will highlight interventions that demonstrate significant impact in published studies from various countries.

conclusionsGiven the rising prevalence of burnout among nurses and its detrimental effects on individuals and health care organizations, the findings from this systematic review are expected to inform health care policy and practice. By evaluating different interventions, it will provide insights into the most effective strategies, contributing to evidence-based practices that support nurses' mental health and well-being. The findings can support stakeholders in developing and implementing targeted strategies to combat nurse burnout, ultimately enhancing the quality of patient care and health care delivery. In addition, the findings will also offer valuable information for researchers, guiding future practice and research in this area.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42024505762; https://tinyurl.com/4p84dk3d. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/58692.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalNursesSystematic Reviews as TopicHumansburnoutburnout interventioneffectivenessevidence-based interventionmental health.nurseprotocolpsychoeducationpsychoeducational interventionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39348680
PMCPMC11474121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.