Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39348439›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2024

A quasi-experimental study about shared decision-making and motivational interviewing on patients with a recent fracture attending Fracture Liaison Services.

Lieke Maas, Mickaël Hiligsmann, Caroline E Wyers, Sandrine Bours, Trudy van der Weijden, Joop P van den Bergh, Marsha van Oostwaard, Sander M J van Kuijk, Annelies Boonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lieke MaasDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0032-0712
Mickaël HiligsmannDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4274-9258
Caroline E WyersDepartment of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, 5912 BL Venlo, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7662-3990
Sandrine BoursDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Trudy van der WeijdenDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7469-3781
Joop P van den BerghDepartment of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, 5912 BL Venlo, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3984-2232
Marsha van OostwaardDepartment of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, 5912 BL Venlo, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2643-1592
Sander M J van KuijkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2796-729X
Annelies BoonenDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0682-9533

Funding

Medical Ethics Committee METC2028-0507-A-10ZonMw research line Rational Pharmacotherapy 848016001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared decision-making (SDM) aims to improve patients' experiences with care, treatment adherence, and health outcomes. However, the effectiveness of SDM in patients with a recent fracture who require anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM) is unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a multicomponent adherence intervention (MCAI) including a patient decision aid (PDA) and motivational interviewing at Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) on multiple outcomes compared with usual care (UC). This pre-post superiority study included patients with a recent fracture attending FLS and with AOM treatment indication. The primary outcome was 1-year AOM persistence measured by pharmacy records. Secondary outcomes included treatment initiation, AOM adherence (measured by medication possession ratio [MPR]), decision quality (SDM process; 0-100, best), and decisional conflict (0-100, highest conflict), subsequent fractures, and mortality. Outcomes were tested in MCAI and UC groups at the first FLS visit and 4 and 12 months afterwards. Multiple imputation and uni- and multivariable analyses were performed. Post hoc analyses assessed the role of health literacy level. In total, 245 patients (MCAI: n = 136, UC: n = 109) were included. AOM persistence was 80.4% in the MCAI and 76.7% in the UC group (p=.626). SDM process scores were significantly better in MCAI (60.4 vs 55.1; p = .003). AOM initiation (97.8% vs 97.5%), MPR (90.9% vs 88.3%, p=.582), and decisional conflict (21.7 vs 23.0; p = .314) did not differ between groups. Results did not change importantly after adjustment. Stratified analyses by health literacy showed a better effect on MPR and SDM in those with adequate health literacy. This study showed no significant effect on AOM persistence; however, it demonstrated a significant positive effect of MCAI on SDM process in FLS attendees. (Netherlands Trial Registry, Trial NL7236 [NTR7435]; version 1.0; 26-11-2020 https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/nl/trial/22858).

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedMotivational InterviewingAgedFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMaleMiddle Agedanti-osteoporosis medicationfractureFracture Liaison Servicesmedication adherencemedication persistenceosteoporosispatient decision aidshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID39348439
PMCPMC11523095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.