ArticlePloS one2024
Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal association of anthropometric measures on sepsis risk and mortality.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to explore the potential causalities of fat mass, nonfat mass and height (henceforth, 'anthropometric measures') with sepsis risk and mortality. We conducted the Mendelian randomization (MR) investigation using genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics of anthropometric measures, sepsis, and sepsis mortality. The GWAS summary data from the UK Biobank was used. Firstly, MR analysis was performed to estimate the causal effect of anthropometric measures on the risk of sepsis. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was utilized as the primary analytical approach, together with weighted median-based method. Cochrane's Q test and MR-Egger intercept test were performed to assess heterogeneity and pleiotropy, respectively. Finally, we performed a series of sensitivity analyses to enhance the precision and veracity of our findings. The IVW method showed that genetically predicted weight-related measures were suggestively linked to an increased risk of sepsis. However, height displayed no causal association with sepsis risk and mortality. Furthermore, weight-related measures also displayed significant MR association with the sepsis mortality, except body nonfat mass and right leg nonfat mass. However, MVMR analysis indicated the observed effects for weight-related measures in the univariable MR analyses are more likely a bias caused by the interrelationship between anthropometric measures. According to the MR-Egger intercept assessment, our MR examination was not influenced by horizontal pleiotropy (all p>0.05). Moreover, the reliability of the estimated causal association was confirmed by the sensitivity analyses. In conclusion, these findings provided vital new knowledge on the role of anthropometric-related measures in the sepsis etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.