Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39348344›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Prediction model for recommending coronary artery calcium score screening (CAC-prob) in cardiology outpatient units: A development study.

Pakpoom Wongyikul, Apichat Tantraworasin, Pannipa Suwannasom, Tanop Srisuwan, Yutthaphan Wannasopha, Phichayut Phinyo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pakpoom WongyikulCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4998-6977
Apichat TantraworasinGeneral Thoracic Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7913-2799
Pannipa SuwannasomDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Tanop SrisuwanDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Yutthaphan WannasophaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6727-0828
Phichayut PhinyoCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8543-6254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the well-established significance of the CAC score as a cardiovascular risk marker, the timing of using CAC score in routine clinical practice remains unclear. We aim to develop a prediction model for patients visiting outpatient cardiology units, which can recommend whether CAC score screening is necessary. A prediction model using retrospective cross-sectional design was conducted. Patients who underwent CAC score screening were included. Eight candidate predictors were preselected, including age, gender, DM or primary hypertension, angina chest pain, LDL-C (≥130 mg/dl), presence of low HDL-C, triglyceride (≥150 mg/dl), and eGFR. The outcome of interest was the level of CAC score (CAC score 0, CAC score 1-99, CAC score ≥100). The model was developed using ordinal logistic regression, and model performance was evaluated in terms of discriminative ability and calibration. A total of 360 patients were recruited for analysis, comprising 136 with CAC score 0, 133 with CAC score 1-99, and 111 with CAC score ≥100. The final predictors identified were age, male gender, presence of hypertension or DM, and low HDL-C. The model demonstrated excellent discriminative ability (Ordinal C-statistics of 0.81) with visually good agreement on calibration plots. The implementation of this model (CAC-prob) has the potential to enhance precision in recommending CAC screening. However, external validation is necessary to assess its robustness in new patient cohorts.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseAgedCalciumCoronary VesselsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOutpatientsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsVascular CalcificationCalcium

Identifiers

PMID39348344
PMCPMC11441643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.