ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2024
Predictive Model Building for Aggregation Kinetics Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Antibody Fragment.
Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and ultra-high performance computing methods and experiments for drug discovery: virtual screening, deep learning, molecular dynamics simulations, ADMET modelling, and experimental validation.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Quality by Design to Mitigate Aggregation: Mechanistic Insights and Analytical Strategies for Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Review
- Hotspot Interactions between Two Fab Molecules in Molecular Dynamics Simulations Improve Predictive Models of Aggregation Kinetics.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Stability Testing Reveals Photoselective Clipping of Heavy Chain C-Terminal Amino Acids That Leads to Fragmentation and Aggregation of an Antibody Fab Fragment.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Machine learning driven acceleration of biopharmaceutical formulation development using Excipient Prediction Software (ExPreSo).Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational methods including machine learning and molecular dynamics simulations have strong potential to characterize, understand, and ultimately predict the properties of proteins relevant to their stability and function as therapeutics. Such methods would streamline the development pathway by minimizing the current experimental testing required for many protein variants and formulations. The molecular understanding of thermostability and aggregation propensity has advanced significantly along with predictive algorithms based on the sequence-level or structural-level information on a protein. However, these approaches focus largely on a comparison of protein sequence variations to correlate the properties of proteins to their stability, solubility, and aggregation propensity. For therapeutic protein development, it is of equal importance to take into account the impact of the formulation conditions to elucidate and predict the stability of the antibody drugs. At the macroscopic level, changing temperature, pH, ionic strength, and the addition of excipients can significantly alter the kinetics of protein aggregation. The mechanisms controlling aggregation kinetics have been traced back to a combination of molecular features, including conformational stability, partial unfolding to aggregation-prone states, and the colloidal stability governed by surface charges and hydrophobicity. However, very little has been done to evaluate these features in the context of protein dynamics in different formulations. In this work, we have combined a range of molecular features calculated from the Fab A33 protein sequence and molecular dynamics simulations. Using the power of advanced, yet interpretable, statistical tools, it has been possible to uncover greater insights into the mechanisms behind protein stability, validating previous findings, and also develop models that can predict the aggregation kinetics within a range of 49 different solution conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.