Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39348136›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Exploring Scotopic Microperimetry as an Outcome Measure in Choroideremia.

Laura J Taylor, Amandeep S Josan, Daniel Adeyoju, Jasleen K Jolly, Robert E MacLaren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. An Analysis of Scotopic Microperimetry in Healthy Adults.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura J TaylorNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Amandeep S JosanNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Daniel AdeyojuOxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Jasleen K JollyVision and Eye Research Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Robert E MacLarenNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Choroideremia is an X-linked outer retinal degeneration. Early symptoms include nyctalopia and progressive visual field loss, but visual acuity is preserved until late disease stages. Dark-adapted two-color fundus-controlled perimetry (also known as scotopic microperimetry) has been developed to enable spatial assessment of rod and cone photoreceptor function. This study explores the use of scotopic microperimetry in patients with choroideremia. Methods: Twenty patients with choroideremia and 21 age-matched healthy controls completed visual acuity and scotopic microperimetry testing, which used the Scotopic Macular Integrity Assessment (S-MAIA) microperimeter. A subset of participants completed repeat scotopic testing to enable Bland-Altman repeatability analyses. Test reliability was assessed using fixation stability, fixation losses, and assessment of the rod-free zones. Pointwise sensitivity, mean sensitivity, and volume sensitivity indices were analyzed. Results: False positive responses were the main source of poor test reliability, indicated by stimuli responses in the physiological blind spot and lack of rod-free mapping. Scotopic cyan and red sensitivities were significantly reduced in choroideremia participants (n = 17) compared to healthy controls (n = 16) (P < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test). Scotopic cyan sensitivity was statistically lower than scotopic red sensitivity in both healthy controls and choroideremia (P < 0.01, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Interpretation of scotopic cyan-red differences should be used with caution due to high test-retest variability. Conclusions: Scotopic microperimetry could be a useful outcome measure in patients with early choroideremia. Careful selection of test grid design and sensitivity indices is required. Translational Relevance: Scotopic microperimetry may be a useful outcome measure in clinical trials for patients with early stage choroideremia.

Indexed as

ChoroideremiaVisual AcuityVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesDark AdaptationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39348136
PMCPMC11441449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.