ArticleJAMA network open2024
Tracking COVID-19 Infections Using Survey Data on Rapid At-Home Tests.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Representativeness and response validity across nine opt-in online samples.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Fertility care in the age of algorithms: opportunities and risks of AI and social media integration in reproductive medicine.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Premature termination of unemployment benefits increased COVID-19 transmission and deaths in the USA.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Wastewater-based epidemiology reveals spatiotemporal dynamics and diurnal temperature range effects on post-pandemic SARS-CoV-2 infection burden in Chongqing, China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The spatial distribution of the U.S. childfree population: Does state context matter?PloS one · 2026Article
- Characterizing population-level changes in human behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Self-Reported SARS-CoV-2 Infections among National Blood Donor Cohort, United States, 2020-2022.Emerging infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Community Vulnerability: Measuring the Health Situation of a Population After COVID-19 Through Electronic Health Record Indicators.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- High prevalence of undocumented SARS-CoV-2 infections revealed by analysis of nucleocapsid-specific IgG responses in diagnosed and undiagnosed individuals.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Identifying and tracking new infections during an emerging pandemic is crucial to design and deploy interventions to protect populations and mitigate the pandemic's effects, yet it remains a challenging task. Objective: To characterize the ability of nonprobability online surveys to longitudinally estimate the number of COVID-19 infections in the population both in the presence and absence of institutionalized testing. Design, Setting, and Participants: Internet-based online nonprobability surveys were conducted among residents aged 18 years or older across 50 US states and the District of Columbia, using the PureSpectrum survey vendor, approximately every 6 weeks between June 1, 2020, and January 31, 2023, for a multiuniversity consortium-the COVID States Project. Surveys collected information on COVID-19 infections with representative state-level quotas applied to balance age, sex, race and ethnicity, and geographic distribution. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were (1) survey-weighted estimates of new monthly confirmed COVID-19 cases in the US from January 2020 to January 2023 and (2) estimates of uncounted test-confirmed cases from February 1, 2022, to January 1, 2023. These estimates were compared with institutionally reported COVID-19 infections collected by Johns Hopkins University and wastewater viral concentrations for SARS-CoV-2 from Biobot Analytics. Results: The survey spanned 17 waves deployed from June 1, 2020, to January 31, 2023, with a total of 408 515 responses from 306 799 respondents (mean [SD] age, 42.8 [13.0] years; 202 416 women [66.0%]). Overall, 64 946 respondents (15.9%) self-reported a test-confirmed COVID-19 infection. National survey-weighted test-confirmed COVID-19 estimates were strongly correlated with institutionally reported COVID-19 infections (Pearson correlation, r = 0.96; P < .001) from April 2020 to January 2022 (50-state correlation mean [SD] value, r = 0.88 [0.07]). This was before the government-led mass distribution of at-home rapid tests. After January 2022, correlation was diminished and no longer statistically significant (r = 0.55; P = .08; 50-state correlation mean [SD] value, r = 0.48 [0.23]). In contrast, survey COVID-19 estimates correlated highly with SARS-CoV-2 viral concentrations in wastewater both before (r = 0.92; P < .001) and after (r = 0.89; P < .001) January 2022. Institutionally reported COVID-19 cases correlated (r = 0.79; P < .001) with wastewater viral concentrations before January 2022, but poorly (r = 0.31; P = .35) after, suggesting that both survey and wastewater estimates may have better captured test-confirmed COVID-19 infections after January 2022. Consistent correlation patterns were observed at the state level. Based on national-level survey estimates, approximately 54 million COVID-19 cases were likely unaccounted for in official records between January 2022 and January 2023. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that nonprobability survey data can be used to estimate the temporal evolution of test-confirmed infections during an emerging disease outbreak. Self-reporting tools may enable government and health care officials to implement accessible and affordable at-home testing for efficient infection monitoring in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.