ArticleMolecular diversity2025
Comprehensive investigation of network pharmacology, computational modeling, and pharmacokinetic assessment to evaluate the efficacy of flavonoids in rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular mechanisms of herbal medicines and bioactive compounds in rheumatoid arthritis: a comprehensive network pharmacology perspective.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Therapeutic effects of ginkgetin on rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from network pharmacology and experimental validation.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Can alternatives to animal testing yield useful information regarding biological mechanisms and drug discovery?Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
- Core autophagy genes and immune infiltration characteristics in rheumatoid arthritis: A bioinformatics study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation and joint damage, imposing a significant burden on affected individuals worldwide. Flavonoids, a class of natural compounds abundant in various plant-based foods, have shown promising anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects, suggesting their potential as therapeutic agents for RA. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive investigation of identified LCMS compounds utilizing network pharmacology, computational modeling, in silico approaches, and pharmacokinetic assessment to evaluate the efficacy of flavonoids in RA treatment. The study identified 5 flavonoid structures with common targets via LCMS and Integration of network pharmacology approaches enabled a comprehensive evaluation of the pharmacological profile of flavonoids in the context of RA treatment, guiding the selection of promising candidates for further experimental validation and clinical development. The top 10 targets were AKT1, PI3KR1, CDK2, EGFR, CDK6, NOS2, FLT3, ALOX5, CCNB1, and PTPRS via PPI network. The investigation emphasized several pathways, including the AGE-RAGE signaling pathway, resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the PI3K-AKT signaling network, and the Rap 1 signaling pathway. In silico studies estimated binding affinities that ranged from - 7.0 to - 10.0 kcal/mol. Schaftoside and Vitexin showed no toxicity in computational approach and found suitable for further investigations. Overall, our study underscores the potential of flavonoids as therapeutic agents for RA and highlights the utility of integrative approaches combining network pharmacology, computational modeling, in silico methods, and pharmacokinetic assessment in drug discovery and development processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39348084What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.