Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39348082›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2024

3D printed polycaprolactone/gelatin/ordered mesoporous calcium magnesium silicate nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue regeneration.

Zahra Mirzavandi, Seyed Ali Poursamar, Farshad Amiri, Ashkan Bigham, Mohammad Rafienia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zahra MirzavandiDepartment of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Seyed Ali PoursamarDepartment of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Farshad AmiriDepartment of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ashkan BighamInstitute of Polymers, Composites, and Biomaterials, National Research Council, Naples, Italy.
Mohammad RafieniaDepartment of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. m_rafienia@med.mui.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6030-5082

Funding

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 399815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering scaffolds are three-dimensional structures that provide an appropriate environment for cellular attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. Depending on their specific purpose, these scaffolds must possess distinct features, including appropriate mechanical properties, porosity, desired degradation rate, and cell compatibility. This investigation aimed to fabricate a new nanocomposite scaffold using a 3D printing technique composed of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL)/Gelatin (GEL)/ordered mesoporous calcium-magnesium silicate (om-CMS) particles. Different weight ratios of om-CMS were added and optimized, and a series of scaffolds were constructed for comparison purposes, including PCL 50%/Gel 50%, PCL 50%/Gel 45%/om-CMS%5, and PCL 50%/Gel 40%/om-CMS%10. The optimized weight ratio of om-CMS was 10% without leaving behind negative effects on the filaments' structure. The scaffolds' physical and chemical properties were assessed using various techniques, and their degradation rate, bioactivity potential, cell viability, attachment, and ALP activity were evaluated in vitro. The results demonstrated that the PCL 50%/Gel 40%/om-CMS10% scaffold had promising potential for further studies in bone tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationGelatinNanocompositesPolyestersPrinting, Three-DimensionalSilicatesTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesCalciumCalcium CompoundsCell AdhesionCell ProliferationCell SurvivalBiocompatible MaterialsCalciumCalcium Compoundscalcium silicateGelatinMagnesiumMagnesium SilicatespolycaprolactonePolyestersSilicates

Identifiers

PMID39348082
PMCPMC11442632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.