Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39348032›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2024

Educating patients about patient-reported outcomes-are we there yet?

Elizabeth Unni, Maud M van Muilekom, Kate Absolom, Bishnu Bajgain, Lotte Haverman, Maria Santana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Factors associated with response to patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review of systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Value-based Healthcare: Making PROMs Work for Musculoskeletal Care.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth UnniSocial, Behavioral, and Administrative Pharmacy, Touro College of Pharmacy, New York, NY, USA. Elizabeth.unni@touro.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9968-4366
Maud M van MuilekomEmma Children's Hospital, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kate AbsolomLeeds Institute of Health Services Research, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Bishnu BajgainDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Lotte HavermanEmma Children's Hospital, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maria SantanaPatient and Family-Centered Care Scientist, Departments of Pediatrics and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in clinical settings can improve patient outcomes by enhancing communication between patient and provider. There has been significant improvements in the development of PROMs, their implementation in routine patient clinical care, training physicians and other healthcare providers to interpret the PROMs results to identify any issues reported by the patient, and to use the PROMs results to provide or modify the treatment. MAIN BODY: Despite the increased use of PROMs, the lack of PROM completion by patients is a major concern in the optimal use of PROMs. Studies have shown several reasons why patients do not complete PROMs and one of the reasons is their lack of understanding of the significance of PROMs and their utility in their clinical care. While examining the various strategies that can be used to improve the uptake of PROM completion by patients, educating patients about the use of PROMs has been recommended. There is less evidence on how patients are trained or educated about PROMs. It may also be possible that the patient education strategies are not reported in the publications. This brings up the question of evaluation of the educational strategies used.

conclusionOur symposium at the 2023 ISOQOL conference brought together a range of experiences and learning around patient-centered PROMs educational activities used in the Netherlands, Canada, and the UK. This commentary is aimed to describe the lay of the land about educational activities around the use of PROMs in clinical care for patients, recognizing the gaps, and posing questions to be considered by the research and clinical community.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresHumansNetherlandsClinical practicePatient educationPatient reported outcome measures

Identifiers

PMID39348032
PMCPMC11442418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.