ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024
Computer modeling and validation testing for glenoid component rotation and optimal glenoid screw angles for reverse shoulder arthroplasty in an Asian population.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The influence of humeral implant alignment on the arm position in the coronal plane after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGood initial fixation of glenoid component for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) relies on component placement and screw purchase in the scapula bone. This is especially difficult in an Asian population with small glenoid geometry. Optimal glenoid component roll angle and screw angulation to achieve the longest screws for best fixation has not been defined in the current literature.
methodsComputer 3D modelling of 133 scapulas with RTSA performed were analyzed to determine patient specific optimal glenoid roll angle (GRA) for the longest bi-cortical screws attainable. The cranial-caudal angle (CCA), anterior-posterior angle (APA) and lengths for the superior and inferior screws were measured. Validation testing using calculated average (CA) angles and rounded average (RA) angles to the nearest 5 degree were recomputed for each case to determine the bi-cortical screw lengths achievable. The CA and RA screw lengths were compared against patient specific modelling using paired-sample t-tests.
resultsAverage GRA was - 1.6°, almost perpendicular to the long axis of the glenoid and achieves an average bi-cortical screw length of 51.3 mm and 45.5 mm for the superior and inferior screws respectively. The CCA and APA were 9.1° cranial and 6.5° posterior for the superior screw and screw angulation of 11.2° caudal and 0.7° anterior for the inferior screw. Validation testing shows statistically shorter screw lengths in the CA and RA models compared to patient specific modelling (p < 0.01).
conclusionValidation testing with average angles for GRA, CCA and APA demonstrates strong patient heterogeneity and anatomical variation. Despite this, screw lengths attainable in the RA group were > 38 mm with good safety profile. Surgeons may consider the additional use of navigation-assisted, or 3D printed patient specific instrumentation to optimize baseplate and screw configuration for RTSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.