ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
The role of video-assisted thoracoscopy in chest trauma: a retrospective monocentric experience.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Video-assisted thoracoscopy (VAT) plays an essential role in the exploration of pleural cavity after thoracic trauma, although some doubts about the precise and specific indications persist. This study examines the eligibility criteria for videothoracoscopy and establishes the ideal timing for VAT. Between January 2011 and November 2022, we observed 923 polytraumatized patients. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scan total body with and without contrast enhancement. Two hundred and nine patients carried out VAT within 10 ± 2 h of injury while 8 patients after 20 ± 1 h. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 31 ± 1 and the Glasgow Coma Scale was 14.1 ± 0.3 upon arrival at the hospital. One hundred and nineteen patients displayed hemothorax (55%), 62 hemopneumothorax (28.5%), 21 penetrating wound (9.6%), 10 pneumothorax (4.6%) and 5 chylothorax (2.3%). In 18 patients (8.3%) without vascular, diaphragmatic, or parenchymal lesion the treatment consisted in chest tube placement. VAT was converted to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in 190 patients (87.5%), to open surgery in 8 (3.7%) and to laparoscopy in 1 (0.5%). Twelve patients (5.5%) with diaphragm ruptures < 5 cm in diameter were treated by separate stitches suture in VATS. Only eight postoperative complications (4 pneumonia, three atelectasis and one pulmonary embolism) out of 217 VAT, positively resolved with medical treatment, were noted exclusively in patients undergoing minimally invasive approach 20 ± 1 h after trauma. Early VAT in selected patients is a safe and easy procedure that ensure a quick diagnosis of lesions and an accurate management of the most thoracic injuries among trauma patients. The prompt identification of injuries, to avoid life-threatening conditions requiring rapid intervention, responds to medico-legal needs to which VAT fulfills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39347940What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.