ArticleCJEM2024
Ready to launch: a cross-sectional study of field trauma triage and air-ambulance policies across Canada.
Article in CJEM, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to understand current prehospital trauma air-ambulance policies and triage guidelines across Canada. The research question centered on understanding the guidelines used by provinces and territories and identifying potential regional variations in air-ambulance triage.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey from November 2022 to May 2023, involving trauma leaders from Canada's 13 provinces and territories. Participants were identified via the Trauma Association of Canada and professional networks. The survey, developed with expert input and pilot tested for clarity, focused on prehospital trauma-triage guidelines, level of adoption of Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) triage guidelines, and auto-launch air-ambulance policies. Data were collected using an 18-item electronic survey. Potential response bias was considered, and confidentiality was maintained. A cross-sectional qualitative analysis was used to evaluate the guidelines' adoption and variations, with responses compared across regions.
resultsThe analysis revealed a nationwide adoption (11 of 11 respondents) of the CDC guidelines, indicating a standardized approach to patient transportation. Notably, many provinces and territories (5 of 11) endorse auto-launch protocols for air ambulances in specific scenarios. These policies offer advantages in geographically vast regions weighed against the cost of over-triage and inefficient resource allocation. Each province and territory tailors its approach based on factors such as geographic areas served, and available resources.
conclusionThis study provides a snapshot of the current state of prehospital trauma-triage guidelines in Canada. With some differences in nomenclature, Canadian provinces and territories widely apply the CDC guidelines to serve their populations. There is some regional variation on how transport is initiated within their borders. The findings underscore the delicate balance required for optimizing air-ambulance policies, considering factors such as timely access, resource allocation, and the local application of guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39347928What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.