ArticleHead and neck pathology2024
Striated Duct Adenoma: A Case Report and a Scoping Review.
Article in Head and neck pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging of benign salivary gland tumors under the fifth WHO classification, with a focus on rare histologic types and newly listed entities-Part II.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Canalicular Adenomas of Minor Salivary Glands: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStriated duct adenoma (SDA) is a rare benign salivary gland tumor with a recently described genetic signature. Recurrent oncogenic mutations affecting the IDH2 gene differentiate SDA from its primary differential diagnosis of canalicular adenoma. Here, we report a case of SDA affecting the parotid gland with IDH1/2 mutation-specific immunohistochemical positivity. Additionally, we provide a scoping review developed according to the Cochrane Methodology and reported following the Joana Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist to synthesize all previously published cases of SDA. The review protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) platform ( https://osf.io/7mztg ). The searches were performed using Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and LILACS, with no date or language limit. Studies were evaluated for eligibility, extracted, and compiled in a narrative form. Seven studies with 20 patients with SDA, including ours, were analyzed. The tumors mainly affected the parotid gland (13/20) in patients with a mean age of 62 years and did not display sex predilection. Swelling was the leading clinical symptom. The mean follow-up duration was 26 months with no recurrence or metastasis after resection.
conclusionAwareness of the clinicopathological features and the use of IDH1/2 mutation-specific immunohistochemistry are pivotal for the consistent identification of SDA, and assessment for true biological potential will require increased follow-up and scrutiny.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.