ArticleMaternal and child health journal2024
A Community-Informed Maternal and Infant Health Needs Assessment in Alabama.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMaternal mortality is a global clinical and public health crisis. Researchers and leading organizations have highlighted the need for local partnerships to implement evidence-based strategies to mitigate poor outcomes. Alabama has the third highest maternal mortality rate in the nation. Research on the complexity of maternity mortality is strengthening, but poor outcomes in Alabama persist and there is limited data highlighting the perspectives of those on the frontlines of providing and receiving care. PURPOSE: We conducted a qualitative, statewide, community-informed, maternal and infant health research assessment with physicians, providers, professionals, and birthing persons to identify challenges and solutions to addressing the states' poor perinatal health outcomes.
methodsData were collected using a four-phase, research design that included semi-structured interviews, focus groups, one state-wide data sharing event, and five regional data sharing events. Data were collected between January 2020 and October 2021. The data were analyzed using consensus coding and thematic analysis. MAIN
findingsFifty-nine (N = 59) individuals participated. Three themes emerged: 1) "They were making me feel so overlooked.": A disconnect between perinatal healthcare services and patient needs; 2) "That shouldn't be something you have to ask for.": Limitations to providing respectful perinatal healthcare; and 3) "If they work together, they can have all the tools they need.": Building a case for collaborative care.
conclusionsParticipants advocated for a collaborative perinatal healthcare model that focuses on the provision of respectful, quality perinatal healthcare. Our approach can be applied across contexts and used to support the effective implementation of contextually relevant maternity care practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.