Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39347866›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025

Endovascular treatment in ischemic strokes with large infarct core: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Marco Longoni, Sebastiano Giacomozzi, Leonardo Pantoni, Simone Vidale

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marco LongoniDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Bufalini Hospital, AUSLRomagna, Cesena, Italy. marco.longoni@auslromagna.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2173-4858
Sebastiano GiacomozziDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Bufalini Hospital, AUSLRomagna, Cesena, Italy.
Leonardo PantoniDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Neuroscience Research Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Simone VidaleDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndovascular treatment (EVT) is recommended for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO) and an ASPECTs ≥ 6. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have become available on effect of EVT in patients with LVO-related large core infarct stroke (ASPECTS 0-5). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials on patients with large core infarct treated with thrombectomy compared to best medical therapy (BMT).

methodsThe study followed PRISMA guidelines. Primary endpoint was functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale mRS < 3). Secondary endpoints were 3-month moderate disability (mRS < 4), excellent outcome (mRS < 2) and change in mRS (shift analysis). Safety outcomes were: symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month mortality.

resultsSeven RCTs were included with a total of 1964 patients. Functional independence was significantly more frequent in EVT vs BMT group (19.4% vs 8%; OR = 2.72, 95%CI = 2.06-3.61, p

conclusionsThis updated pooled data show that, in LVO-stroke patients with a large core infarct, EVT plus BMT (as compared to BMT alone) increases significantly the chances of achieving a good functional outcome at 90 days and reduces the 3- month mortality despite a marginal increase in acute sICH.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicThrombectomyHumansTreatment OutcomeLarge ischemic strokeMechanical thrombectomyMeta-analysisRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.