ArticleSkeletal radiology2025
Phenotypic variations in knee osteoarthritis: insights from MRI and radiographic comparisons.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning assisted prediction of cartilage histology using MR fingerprinting - a preliminary study.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the correlation between MRI-based phenotypes (cartilage-meniscus, subchondral bone, and inflammatory) and radiography-based atrophic and hypertrophic phenotypes, aiming to demonstrate MRI's diagnostic capability in identifying complex osteoarthritis phenotypes that radiography cannot fully capture. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis single-center retrospective study examined knee radiographs and MRIs of patients from November 2021 to April 2023 to identify osteoarthritis phenotypes. Radiographs were staged by the Kellgren-Lawrence system, and both modalities were classified into atrophic or hypertrophic phenotypes. MRIs were further classified into three phenotypes: cartilage-meniscus, subchondral bone, and inflammatory. Associations between phenotypes, Kellgren-Lawrence stage, age, and gender were analyzed with Pearson chi-square test and student T-test. Reliability measurements were evaluated using kappa statistic.
resultsA total of 214 knees from 187 individuals (73.3% women, 26.7% men; mean age 57.1 ± 9.1 years) were included. The hypertrophic MRI phenotype was significantly associated with cartilage-meniscus and subchondral bone phenotypes (p < 0.001). Cartilage-meniscus and subchondral bone phenotypes were less prevalent in Kellgren-Lawrence stage 2 than in stages 3 and 4 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). The subchondral bone phenotype was more common in men (p = 0.022), and the cartilage-meniscus phenotype in the elderly (p < 0.001). Radiography and MRI had substantial agreement (Kappa = 0.637, p < 0.001) in diagnosing hypertrophic and atrophic phenotypes.
conclusionThe hypertrophic phenotype was associated with cartilage-meniscus and subchondral bone phenotypes, with lower prevalences in Kellgren-Lawrence stage 2 knees. MRI offers enhanced phenotypic characterization, which facilitates more precise and individualized management in osteoarthritis care. Despite limitations compared to MRI, radiography remains valuable for the evaluation of hypertrophic and atrophic phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39347861What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.