ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
Improved ground truth annotation by multimodal image registration from 3D ultrasound to histopathology for resected tongue carcinoma.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study's objectives are (1) to investigate the registration accuracy from intraoperative ultrasound (US) to histopathological images, (2) to assess the agreement and correlation between measurements in registered 3D US and histopathology, and (3) to train a nnUNet model for automatic segmentation of 3D US volumes of resected tongue specimens.
methodsTen 3D US volumes were acquired, including the corresponding digitalized histopathological images (n = 29). Based on corresponding landmarks, the registrations between 3D US and histopathology images were calculated and evaluated using the target registration error (TRE). Tumor thickness and resection margins were measured based on three annotations: (1) manual histopathological tumor annotation (HTA), manual 3D US tumor annotation, and (2) the HTA registered in the 3D US. The agreement and correlation were computed between the measurements based on the HTA and those based on the manual US and registered HTA in US. A deep-learning model with nnUNet was trained on 151 3D US volumes. Segmentation metrics quantified the model's performance.
resultsThe median TRE was 0.42 mm. The smallest mean difference was between registered HTA in US and histopathology with 2.16 mm (95% CI - 1.31; 5.63) and a correlation of 0.924 (p < 0.001). The nnUNet predicted the tumor with a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.621, an average surface distance of 1.15 mm, and a Hausdorff distance of 3.70 mm.
conclusionMultimodal image registration enabled the HTA's registration in the US images and improved the agreement and correlation between the modalities. In the future, this could be used to annotate ground truth labels accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.