ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025
Preliminary antifibrotic and vasoconstrictor effects of adrenaline in Schlemm's canal and suprachoroidal minimally invasive glaucoma surgery in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trabecular Meshwork-Based MIGS: Efficacy, Technique Variability, and Wound Healing-A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the antifibrotic and vasoconstrictor effects of adrenaline in Schlemm's canal and suprachoroidal minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS).
methodsHuman trabecular meshwork (TM) cells were treated with different concentrations of adrenaline (0%, 0.0005%, 0.01%), and we measured the effects on contractility, cell viability and the expression of key cell cycle and fibrosis genes. Adrenaline 0.05% was also injected intracamerally in five primary open-angle glaucoma patients undergoing iStent inject or MINIject surgery combined with phacoemulsification. All patients were assessed for ocular and systemic adverse reactions, including the effects on intraoperative pupil size, preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and anterior segment OCT results.
resultsAdrenaline significantly reduced the contractility of TM cells in a dose-dependent manner (87.8%, 80.6%, 7.9% matrix contraction with adrenaline 0%, 0.0005%, 0.01%, respectively). Adrenaline did not exhibit any significant cytotoxicity even at high concentrations (P > 0.05). Adrenaline 0.01% significantly downregulated the expression of key cell cycle genes in the G2 and M phases, and also decreased the expression of MRTFB and ACTA2 genes (P < 0.05). Intracameral injections of adrenaline 0.05% in the five MIGS patients did not result in any ocular or systemic adverse effects.
conclusionWe recommend intracameral injections of adrenaline 0.05% as a cheap and safe drug to be used before MIGS insertion. Adrenaline decreases the risk of bleeding from the trabecular meshwork and also exhibits antifibrotic effects by arresting the cell cycle, thereby increasing the postoperative success rates in MIGS. KEY MESSAGE: What is known Fibrosis is the main cause of surgical failure in minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). Mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil are too toxic to be used inside the eye. What is new Adrenaline reduced the contractility of trabecular meshwork cells and inhibited the expression of key cell cycle genes and fibrosis genes, without significant cytotoxicity. Intracameral injection of adrenaline 0.05% did not result in any ocular or systemic adverse reactions in MIGS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.