Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39347699›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)2025

Facial basis of stereotypes: Judgements of warmth and competence based on cross-group typicality/distinctiveness of faces.

S Adil Saribay, Šimon Pokorný, Petr Tureček, Karel Kleisner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S Adil SaribayKadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7070-7106
Šimon PokornýCharles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr TurečekCharles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2118-9909
Karel KleisnerCharles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3277-8365

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 21-10527S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human migration is an increasingly common phenomenon and migrants are at risk of disadvantageous treatment. We reasoned that migrants may receive differential treatment by locals based on the closeness of their facial features to the host average. Residents of Türkiye, the country with the largest number of refugees currently, served as participants. Because many of these refugees are of Arabic origin, we created target facial stimuli varying along the axis connecting Turkish and Arabic morphological prototypes (excluding skin colour) computed using geometric morphometrics and available databases. Participants made judgements of two universal dimensions of social perception-warmth and competence-on these faces. We predicted that participants judging faces manipulated towards the Turkish average would provide higher warmth and competence ratings compared to judging the same faces manipulated towards the Arabic average. Bayesian statistical tools were employed to estimate parameter values in multilevel models with intercorrelated varying effects. The findings did not support the prediction and revealed raters (as well as target faces) to be an important source of variation in social judgements. In the absence of simple cues (e.g. skin colour, group labels), the effect of facial morphology on social judgements may be much more complex than previously assumed.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionJudgmentSocial PerceptionStereotypingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleRefugeesTurkeyYoung Adultface perceptionfacial morphologygeometric morphometricsintergroup relationsstereotype content modelstereotyping

Identifiers

PMID39347699
PMCPMC11724689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.