Trial reportJAMA cardiology2025
Cardiac Myosin Inhibition in Heart Failure With Normal and Supranormal Ejection Fraction: Primary Results of the EMBARK-HFpEF Trial.
Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04766892 (An Exploratory, Open-label, Proof-of-concept, Phase 2a Study of Mavacamten), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Exploratory, Open-label, Proof-of-concept, Phase 2a Study of Mavacamten (MYK-461) in Participants With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) and Chronic Elevation of Cardiac Biomarkers
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myofilament-level effects of aficamten increase diastolic chamber volumes and maintain cardiac output through preserved length-dependent force generation in healthy rat and canine myocardium.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Article
- Complication management in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Anthracycline cardiotoxicity: role of metabolic vulnerability induced by cardiac pressure overload.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Heart Failure with Reduced versus Preserved Ejection Fraction: Molecular Mechanisms, Immunologic Pathways, Current Therapies, and Future Directions.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Severe obesity in human HFpEF alters contractile protein function and organization.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Heart failure in 2025: new insights, therapies, and clinical directions.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Targeting the Sarcomere: Myosin Inhibitors as the Revolutionary Game Changer in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial-inflammatory coupling in HFpEF: an emerging mechanistic framework for understanding the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction in HFpEF: pathophysiologic mechanisms, diagnosis, treatments, and the amplifying potential of sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Deep phenotyping of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction through multi-omics integration.European journal of heart failure · 2025Article
- NEW TREATMENTS FOR HEART FAILURE WITH PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION.The Ulster medical journal · 2025Article
- Mavacamten in the Treatment of Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: from Pathophysiology To Real World Data.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Mechano-energetic uncoupling in heart failure.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Beta blockers linked to reduced 1-Year mortality in critically ill congestive heart failure patients with differential benefits across subgroups.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Novel Drug Targets in Diastolic Heart Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Current Treatment of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Trials and Future Challenges.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Cardiac myosin inhibitors in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) who have left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 60% or greater have limited treatment options. Objective: To examine the effects of cardiac myosin inhibition with mavacamten in patients with HFpEF with LVEF of 60% or greater. Design, Setting, and Participants: The EMBARK-HFpEF trial was a phase 2a, open-label, single-arm, multicenter trial conducted from November 6, 2020, to February 26, 2024, at 20 sites in the US and Canada. Patients with symptomatic HFpEF (defined as a New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class II or III), LVEF of 60% or greater, elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), and left ventricular hypertrophy were eligible for inclusion. Intervention: Mavacamten treatment for 26 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg and potentially titrated up to 5 mg at week 14 based on prespecified LVEF and NTproBNP criteria. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary efficacy end points (measured as the change from baseline to week 26) included NTproBNP and high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT); additional efficacy end points included changes in high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI), NYHA functional class, and echocardiographic parameters (resting and peak exercise). Safety end points included treatment-emergent adverse events and reductions in LVEF to less than 30%. Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled and treated with mavacamten. Median (IQR) patient age was 76 (70-80) years, and 16 patients (53.3%) were female. From baseline to week 26, mavacamten was associated with reductions in NTproBNP (mean reduction, -26%; 95% CI, -44% to -4%; P = .04), hsTnT (mean reduction, -13%; 95% CI, -23% to -3%; P = .02), and hsTnI (mean reduction, -20%; 95% CI, -32% to -6%; P = .01). Cardiac biomarker values returned toward baseline levels 8 weeks after drug discontinuation. NYHA class improved in 10 of 24 patients (41.7%) who had evaluable NYHA class data at the end of treatment, and improvements in echocardiographic markers of LV diastolic function were observed. Mean LVEF decreased by 3.2 absolute percentage points (95% CI, 1.1-5.4; P = .005) during treatment. Mavacamten was interrupted in 3 patients (10% of the study population; 95% CI, 2.1%-26.5%) due to protocol prespecified criteria of LVEF less than 50% (n = 2) or a more than 20% relative decrease from baseline (n = 1; nadir LVEF, 58%), with LVEF recovery observed in all 3 patients. There were no deaths or instances of LVEF less than 30%; 1 patient had worsening heart failure deemed unrelated to the study drug. Conclusions and Relevance: In an open-label trial in patients with HFpEF with LVEF of 60% or greater, mavacamten was associated with improvements in biomarkers of cardiac wall stress and injury, with no sustained reductions in LVEF observed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04766892.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.