Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39347575›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2024

Autoproteolytic mechanism of CdiA toxin release reconstituted

Ana Katrina Y Tiu, Grace C Conroy, Cedric E Bobst, Christine L Hagan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana Katrina Y Tiu *Department of Chemistry, The College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Grace C Conroy *Department of Chemistry, The College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Cedric E BobstMass Spectrometry Core Facility, Institute of Applied Life Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-2680-1100
Christine L HaganDepartment of Chemistry, The College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5883-7351

Funding

Research Corporation for Science Advancement (RCSA) 28179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact-dependent inhibition (CDI) is a mechanism of interbacterial competition in Gram-negative bacteria. Bacteria that contain CDI systems produce a large, filamentous protein, CdiA, on their cell surfaces. CdiA contains a C-terminal toxin domain that is transported across the outer membranes (OMs) of neighboring bacteria. Once inside a target bacterium, the toxin is released from the CdiA protein via a proteolytic mechanism that has not been well characterized. We have developed an IMPORTANCE: It is challenging to develop new antibiotics capable of killing Gram-negative bacteria because their outer membranes are impermeable to many small molecules. Some Gram-negative bacteria, however, deliver much larger protein toxins through the outer membranes of competing bacteria in their environments using contact-dependent inhibition (CDI) systems. How these toxins traverse the outer membranes of their targets is not well understood. We have therefore developed a method to study the toxin delivery process in a highly simplified system using a fragment of a CDI protein. Our results indicate that the CDI protein assembles into a structure in the target membrane that catalyzes the release of the toxin. This CDI protein fragment enables further studies of the toxin delivery mechanism.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsProteolysisBacterial ToxinsMembrane ProteinsBacterial ToxinsCdiA protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsautoproteolysisCdiAcontact-dependent inhibitionouter membraneprotein assemblytoxin transport

Identifiers

PMID39347575
PMCPMC11500576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.