Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39347540›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in neurobiology2024

Modeling for neurosurgical laser interstitial thermal therapy with and without intracranial recording electrodes.

Daniel W Keefe, David T Christianson, Greyson W Davis, Hiroyuki Oya, Matthew A Howard, Christopher I Petkov, Fatima Toor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel W KeefeUniversity of Iowa, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
David T ChristiansonUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Neurosurgery Department, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Greyson W DavisUniversity of Iowa, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Hiroyuki OyaUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Neurosurgery Department, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Matthew A HowardUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Neurosurgery Department, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Christopher I PetkovUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Neurosurgery Department, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Fatima ToorUniversity of Iowa, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.

Funding

Project 5: ComputationalP50MH109429 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI Robert Thomas Knight · 2017 to 2026
$25.3M
Laminar Circuit Motifs for Working Memory and Language Combinatorics: From Cells to SystemsU01NS137991 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jeremy Greenlee, Christopher I Petkov · 2024 to 2026
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH109429NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS137991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser thermal ablation has become a prominent neurosurgical treatment approach, but in epilepsy patients it cannot currently be safely implemented with intracranial recording electrodes that are used to study interictal or epileptiform activity. There is a pressing need for computational models of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) with and without intracranial electrodes to enhance the efficacy and safety of optical neurotherapies. In this paper, we aimed to build a biophysical bioheat and ray optics model to study the effects of laser heating in the brain, with and without intracranial electrodes in the vicinity of the ablation zone during the LITT procedure. COMSOL Multiphysics finite element method (FEM) solver software was used to create a bioheat thermal model of brain tissue, with and without blood flow incorporation via Penne's model, to model neural tissue response to laser heating. We report that the close placement of intracranial electrodes can increase the maximum temperature of the brain tissue volume as well as impact the necrosis region volume if the electrodes are placed too closely to the laser coupled diffuse fiber tip. The model shows that an electrode displacement of 4 mm could be considered a safe distance of intracranial electrode placement away from the LITT probe treatment area. This work, for the first time, models the impact of intracranially implanted recording electrodes during LITT, which could improve the understanding of the LITT treatment procedure on the brain's neural networks a sufficient safe distance to the implanted intracranial recording electrodes. We recommend modeling safe distances for placing the electrodes with respect to the infrared laser coupled diffuse fiber tip.

Indexed as

Bioheat modelingFinite element methodIntracranial electrodesMultiphysicsNeurosurgical laser interstitial thermal therapyNeurotherapy safetyRay optics

Identifiers

PMID39347540
PMCPMC11437873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.