ArticleCurrent research in neurobiology2024
Modeling for neurosurgical laser interstitial thermal therapy with and without intracranial recording electrodes.
Article in Current research in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immediate to longer-term neurophysiological impact of acute neural network disruption.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laser thermal ablation has become a prominent neurosurgical treatment approach, but in epilepsy patients it cannot currently be safely implemented with intracranial recording electrodes that are used to study interictal or epileptiform activity. There is a pressing need for computational models of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) with and without intracranial electrodes to enhance the efficacy and safety of optical neurotherapies. In this paper, we aimed to build a biophysical bioheat and ray optics model to study the effects of laser heating in the brain, with and without intracranial electrodes in the vicinity of the ablation zone during the LITT procedure. COMSOL Multiphysics finite element method (FEM) solver software was used to create a bioheat thermal model of brain tissue, with and without blood flow incorporation via Penne's model, to model neural tissue response to laser heating. We report that the close placement of intracranial electrodes can increase the maximum temperature of the brain tissue volume as well as impact the necrosis region volume if the electrodes are placed too closely to the laser coupled diffuse fiber tip. The model shows that an electrode displacement of 4 mm could be considered a safe distance of intracranial electrode placement away from the LITT probe treatment area. This work, for the first time, models the impact of intracranially implanted recording electrodes during LITT, which could improve the understanding of the LITT treatment procedure on the brain's neural networks a sufficient safe distance to the implanted intracranial recording electrodes. We recommend modeling safe distances for placing the electrodes with respect to the infrared laser coupled diffuse fiber tip.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.